I've done more testing and I've found something very interesting. I've
tested logging with our entire string (which will be below) with slight
changes to the 'if' statement solely looking at the 'dhcp-message-type = '
parameter. Of the four message types we routinely see some work and some
don't:
Timothy Murphy writes:
>
>
> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>
> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
> "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!"
> whe
On Jul 15, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence
>>> between interface and network,
>>> eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24
>>>
>>> Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ?
>>
>> Dhcpd shouldn't
Steve Clark wrote:
> You have to have a subnet declaration(s) that matches an existing
> subnet(s) that is configured on the interface(s) you want to provide
> dynamic addresses for.
But how exactly is a subnet, in my case 192.168.2.0, "configured"
on the interface eth1 ?
--
Timothy Murphy
e
Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence
>> between interface and network,
>> eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24
>>
>> Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ?
>
> Dhcpd shouldn't care about the name of the interface, but if the request
> hasn't
On 7/15/2011 3:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service
on the first IP on the i
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/15/2011 2:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>>
and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
>>> What exactly do you mean wh
On 7/15/2011 2:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>>> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
>>>set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
>>
>> What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
>> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
>
> What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service
> on the first IP on the interfac
On 7/15/2011 1:54 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form:
>>
>> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { }
>>
>> so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to
>> be in newer versions (more stri
On 07/15/2011 02:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
(in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
under CentOS-6, but I'm get
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service
on the first IP on the interface"?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form:
>
> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { }
>
> so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to
> be in newer versions (more strict rules for config file.)
Thanks for your respons
Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
>> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
>> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>>
>> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
>> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
>> "Not con
On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>
> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
> "Not configured to listen on any
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>
> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
> "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!"
> when I "sudo
16 matches
Mail list logo
