William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 03:36 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> That did shutdown the tracker, but it is back on-line now.
>>>
>> FWIW, the tracker is offline again tonight.
>>
>> I'm seeing a few 100 DHT peers for each
>> CentOS-5.1-{i386|x86_64}-
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 03:36 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > That did shutdown the tracker, but it is back on-line now.
> >
>
> FWIW, the tracker is offline again tonight.
>
> I'm seeing a few 100 DHT peers for each
> CentOS-5.1-{i386|x86_64}-bin-DVD so the torrent is f
Johnny Hughes wrote:
That did shutdown the tracker, but it is back on-line now.
FWIW, the tracker is offline again tonight.
I'm seeing a few 100 DHT peers for each
CentOS-5.1-{i386|x86_64}-bin-DVD so the torrent is freely running, but
the tracker has been AWOL for hours now ('offline - t
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:29 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 12:37 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500:
> > >
> > > > Anybody know how I can do the equival
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:29 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 12:37 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500:
> > >
> > > >
> FYI: bittorrent-gui from rpmforge
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 12:37 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500:
> >
> > > Anybody know how I can do the equivalent "distributed" for CentOS on 4.6
> > > or 5.1?
> >
> > It's called
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500:
>
> > Anybody know how I can do the equivalent "distributed" for CentOS on 4.6
> > or 5.1?
>
> It's called DHT in utorrent and is indeed working quite nice without a
> tracker. Ma
as mentioned before there is azureus
http://azureus.sourceforge.net/
runs on java though but supports dht
mike
On 12/19/07, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500:
>
> > Anybody know how I can do the equivalent "distributed" for Cent
William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500:
> Anybody know how I can do the equivalent "distributed" for CentOS on 4.6
> or 5.1?
It's called DHT in utorrent and is indeed working quite nice without a
tracker. Maybe there are Linux clients that support DHT?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 04:35 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> > William L. Maltby wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> >>
> >>> William L. Maltby wrote:
> >>>
>
> > # nmap -sT -p6969 -vv torrent.centos.org
> > ...
> > Interesting port
John R Pierce wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> William L. Maltby wrote:
>>>
I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http and rsync are the only
porst found open. The torrent file show port 6969 - but I don't know
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
as I said prematurely, it appears the tracker is down, HOWEVER... my
uTorrent (MS Windows based) client is nicely finding 107 peers using
distributed tracking techniques (which I don't fully understand)
I'm g
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> as I said prematurely, it appears the tracker is down, HOWEVER... my
> uTorrent (MS Windows based) client is nicely finding 107 peers using
> distributed tracking techniques (which I don't fully understand)
>
> I'm getting wire speeds ju
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:10 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> >
> >> William L. Maltby wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http and rsync are the only
> >>> porst found open. The torr
--On Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:06 PM -0800 Florin Andrei
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is Comcast your Internet provider?
Not on the colocated host I'm connecting from. "telnet torrent.centos.org
6969" fails as well:
Trying 66.147.238.146...
telnet: connect to address 66.147.238.146: Conne
as I said prematurely, it appears the tracker is down, HOWEVER... my
uTorrent (MS Windows based) client is nicely finding 107 peers using
distributed tracking techniques (which I don't fully understand)
I'm getting wire speeds just a few minutes after connecting.
__
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http and rsync are the only
porst found open. The torrent file show port 6969 - but I don't know for
sure if that represents the source po
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http and rsync are the only
> > porst found open. The torrent file show port 6969 - but I don't know for
> > sure if that represents the source port or a port I'm suppos
William L. Maltby wrote:
I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http and rsync are the only
porst found open. The torrent file show port 6969 - but I don't know for
sure if that represents the source port or a port I'm supposed to use
because I don't have the layout of the torrent file. But I
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:06 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > Well, yesterday my 5.1 and 4.6 systems could connect to
> >
> > torrent.centos.org
> >
> > OK. Today neither system can connect. I can ping, but that's all. No
> > changes were made to the firewall during thi
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:06 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > Well, yesterday my 5.1 and 4.6 systems could connect to
> >
> > torrent.centos.org
> >
> > OK. Today neither system can connect. I can ping, but that's all. No
> > changes were made to the firewall during thi
William L. Maltby wrote:
Well, yesterday my 5.1 and 4.6 systems could connect to
torrent.centos.org
OK. Today neither system can connect. I can ping, but that's all. No
changes were made to the firewall during this time.
Any tips on debugging this?
Is Comcast your Internet provider?
--
Fl
22 matches
Mail list logo
