At 15:09 -0800 28/1/15, David C. Miller wrote:
Although I hate Oracle with a fury, one good thing is that they put
all the updates they rebuild for their RHEL clone in a publicly
viewable site. I'm guessing they pay Redhat for extended support on
end of life RHEL4 to get access to the source
On Wed, January 28, 2015 5:09 pm, David C. Miller wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Simon Banton"
>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc ge
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Banton"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
>
> Hi,
>
> For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you al
Hi,
For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have an
obligation to look after a suite of legacy CentOS 4.x systems which
cannot be migrated upwards.
I note on https://access.redhat.com/articles/1332213 the following
comment from a RHN person:
We are currently working on a
On Tue, January 27, 2015 2:35 pm, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
>>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>>
I use Exim on C5 and C6 - sho
On 28/01/15 07:30, Cian Mc Govern wrote:
> Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment:
> https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 &
> https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592
Thanks Cian :)
Pete.
___
CentOS mail
On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>>>
>>> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>>>
>>
>> upstream references:
>
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment:
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 &
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592
On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
> > On 28/01/15 04:4
On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>
>
>>
>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>>
>
> upstream references:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html
When I r
On 28/01/15 06:58, Peter Lawler wrote:
> despite upstream not referencing their 5th edition
> in their notes.
>
Apologies for replying to myself on the list.
Upstream referenced the bug in their 5th edition via a link in their a
BZ, that's how I missed it from their Security Advisory page:
http
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>
>
> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>
upstream references:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-0235
Note that in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
