Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Steven Crothers
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Hm, I failed to change epel, centosplus and elrepo repositories to > official ones. I guess I am going to pay for that if more people start > using it without changing them to official ones. Oh well... > > Ljubomir > Technically not yo

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Lamar Owen wrote: >> On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:33 PM Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: You should install Revisor, and master your own Live media with EPEL or ATrpms or ELrepo or rpmforge or remi or whatnot packages; it's

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Lamar Owen wrote: On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:33 PM Les Mikesell wrote: On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: You should install Revisor, and master your own Live media with EPEL or ATrpms or ELrepo or rpmforge or remi or whatnot packages; it's not that hard. Is revisor scriptable to t

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Lamar Owen
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:33 PM Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > You should install Revisor, and master your own Live media with EPEL or > > ATrpms or ELrepo or rpmforge or remi or whatnot packages; it's not that > > hard. > Is revisor scriptable to the po

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:08 AM n...@nux.ro wrote: >> R P Herrold writes: >>> CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the >>> distribution's packages > >> Why? What's wrong with a few extra packages from EPEL? > > EPEL is not part of CentOS, t

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Lamar Owen
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:08 AM n...@nux.ro wrote: > R P Herrold writes: > > CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the > > distribution's packages > Why? What's wrong with a few extra packages from EPEL? EPEL is not part of CentOS, that's what. Nothing per se is wrong with EPEL

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Arun Khan
On 6/11/11, cornel panceac wrote: >> system rescue cd > sysresccd.org +1 and it has a whole lot more. The swiss knife of rescue/Live CDs. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
n...@li.nux.ro wrote: > Regarding http://twitter.com/CentOS/statuses/79336297579282432 > > I don't have a twitter account so I'm spamming the list since it looks on > topic :) > > I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following: > 1. latest dd_rescue > 2. latest gparted > 3. ntfs-3g > 4. screen > 5.

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread cornel panceac
2011/6/11 > Regarding http://twitter.com/CentOS/statuses/79336297579282432 > > I don't have a twitter account so I'm spamming the list since it looks on > topic :) > > I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following: > 1. latest dd_rescue > 2. latest gparted > 3. ntfs-3g > 4. screen > 5. mc > > How a

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-11 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: n...@li.nux.ro > Subject: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps > > Regarding http://twitter.com/CentOS/statuses/79336297579282432 > > I don't have a twitter account so I'm spamming the list since it looks on > topic :) > > I'd li

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-10 Thread nux
R P Herrold writes: > CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the > distribution's packages Why? What's wrong with a few extra packages from EPEL? It's not like I'm asking for games or eye candy stuff. My 2 lei ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS

Re: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps

2011-06-10 Thread Cody Jackson
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, n...@nux.ro wrote: > I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following: > 1. latest dd_rescue > 2. latest gparted > 3. ntfs-3g > 4. screen > 5. mc I agree with most of this list except I don't use dd_rescue very much; screen and gparted are the two that I would find most useful. mc