On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Hm, I failed to change epel, centosplus and elrepo repositories to
> official ones. I guess I am going to pay for that if more people start
> using it without changing them to official ones. Oh well...
>
> Ljubomir
>
Technically not yo
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:33 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
You should install Revisor, and master your own Live media with EPEL
or ATrpms or ELrepo or rpmforge or remi or whatnot packages; it's
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:33 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
You should install Revisor, and master your own Live media with EPEL or ATrpms
or ELrepo or rpmforge or remi or whatnot packages; it's not that hard.
Is revisor scriptable to t
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:33 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > You should install Revisor, and master your own Live media with EPEL or
> > ATrpms or ELrepo or rpmforge or remi or whatnot packages; it's not that
> > hard.
> Is revisor scriptable to the po
On 6/11/11 11:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:08 AM n...@nux.ro wrote:
>> R P Herrold writes:
>>> CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the
>>> distribution's packages
>
>> Why? What's wrong with a few extra packages from EPEL?
>
> EPEL is not part of CentOS, t
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:56:08 AM n...@nux.ro wrote:
> R P Herrold writes:
> > CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the
> > distribution's packages
> Why? What's wrong with a few extra packages from EPEL?
EPEL is not part of CentOS, that's what. Nothing per se is wrong with EPEL
On 6/11/11, cornel panceac wrote:
>> system rescue cd
> sysresccd.org
+1 and it has a whole lot more. The swiss knife of rescue/Live CDs.
--
Arun Khan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Regarding http://twitter.com/CentOS/statuses/79336297579282432
>
> I don't have a twitter account so I'm spamming the list since it looks on
> topic :)
>
> I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following:
> 1. latest dd_rescue
> 2. latest gparted
> 3. ntfs-3g
> 4. screen
> 5.
2011/6/11
> Regarding http://twitter.com/CentOS/statuses/79336297579282432
>
> I don't have a twitter account so I'm spamming the list since it looks on
> topic :)
>
> I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following:
> 1. latest dd_rescue
> 2. latest gparted
> 3. ntfs-3g
> 4. screen
> 5. mc
>
> How a
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: n...@li.nux.ro
> Subject: [CentOS] C6 LiveCD top 5 apps
>
> Regarding http://twitter.com/CentOS/statuses/79336297579282432
>
> I don't have a twitter account so I'm spamming the list since it looks on
> topic :)
>
> I'd li
R P Herrold writes:
> CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the
> distribution's packages
Why? What's wrong with a few extra packages from EPEL?
It's not like I'm asking for games or eye candy stuff.
My 2 lei
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, n...@nux.ro wrote:
> I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following:
> 1. latest dd_rescue
> 2. latest gparted
> 3. ntfs-3g
> 4. screen
> 5. mc
I agree with most of this list except I don't use dd_rescue very much;
screen and gparted are the two that I would find most useful. mc
12 matches
Mail list logo