Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 01:28 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On May 12, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > >> On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? >>> >>> We've all had trials

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Craig White
On May 13, 2011, at 1:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 05/13/11 11:39 AM, Craig White wrote: >> Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with >> the RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already >> entrenched in a DS server, this would be the way t

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 05/13/11 11:39 AM, Craig White wrote: > Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with the > RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already entrenched > in a DS server, this would be the way to go now. and FreeIPA is the 389 fka FedoraDS bundled wi

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/13/2011 2:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > mark "I'll drink to/with that!" See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page >>> >>> *bleah*! >>> >>> I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work. >>> >>> mark "yeah, for the US gov't" >> >> Is it

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/13/2011 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: mark "I'll drink to/with that!" >>> >>> See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page >> >> *bleah*! >> >> I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work. >> >> mark "yeah, for the US gov't" >

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/13/2011 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> >>> mark "I'll drink to/with that!" >> >> See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page > > *bleah*! > > I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work. > > mark "yeah, for the US gov't" Is it going to be used by d

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread m . roth
Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > On 05/13/2011 07:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Free IPA? India Pale Ale? >> >>mark "I'll drink to/with that!" > > See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page *bleah*! I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work. mark "yeah, for th

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread aurfalien
On May 13, 2011, at 11:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Craig White wrote: >> >> On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more. >> >> Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red >> Hat with >

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 05/13/2011 07:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Free IPA? India Pale Ale? > >mark "I'll drink to/with that!" > See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page -- Athmane Madjoudj RHCE ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread m . roth
Craig White wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > > Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more. > > Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with > the RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't alread

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Craig White
On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more. Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with the RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already entrenched in a DS server,

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread aurfalien
On May 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/13/2011 12:28 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> No, but after reading your post I checked it. >> >> Looks cool, Java based which seems the in thing, I like it. >> >> But, and not to sound lamerz; the Sun sponsor turned me off. > > Sun or

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/13/2011 12:28 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > > No, but after reading your post I checked it. > > Looks cool, Java based which seems the in thing, I like it. > > But, and not to sound lamerz; the Sun sponsor turned me off. Sun or the fact that they are gone now? And where are you seeing thi

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-13 Thread aurfalien
On May 12, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? >> >> We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while >> its >> basically work

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-12 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? > > We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its > basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS > claims mo

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-12 Thread Mathieu Baudier
> Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? Since we develop mostly Java application we use it for development and testing: developers don't have to install an OS dependent LDAP implementation (especially the poor souls working on Windows). In production we use openldap fro

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

2011-05-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 05/12/11 1:07 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? > > We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its > basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS > claims more robust rep