Markus Falb wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:06:38 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> Backup servers need *maximum* protection too..
>
> agreed, but...
> maximum protection would mean turning network off.
> but that could turn out as a little inconvinience.
>
> webservers that cant boot without
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:06:38 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Backup servers need *maximum* protection too..
agreed, but...
maximum protection would mean turning network off.
but that could turn out as a little inconvinience.
webservers that cant boot without human intervention are not acceptabl
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On a server with untrusted users, however, I'd keep it decrypted.
> Er, I'd keep it encrypted.
> There's also the issue of how it gets stored in your backup system.
During the very recent (March 21s
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On a server with untrusted users, however, I'd keep it decrypted.
Er, I'd keep it encrypted.
There's also the issue of how it gets stored in your backup system.
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> After running that and entering my pass phrase, no pass phrase is
> required to start the server and it seems like the browsers don't
> complain, so I think I'm set, but I thought I'd verify that all
> really is well and that doing that isn't going
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> openssl rsa -in secure.shastaherps.key.old -out secure.shastaherps.key
>
> After running that and entering my pass phrase, no pass phrase is
> required to start the server and it seems like the browsers don't
> complain, so I think I'm set, but I thought I'd verify that
6 matches
Mail list logo
