Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>> Personally I'd just drop the secondary mx completely and let the sending >> smtp server queue the mail whenever you're offline. Makes life a lot >> simpler. >> > >I agree. That's why I started with "IF you have a secondary..." :) trust me, I also agree 100%, but users on sourceforge and other

Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-29 Thread Bowie Bailey
Ned Slider wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > >> Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >>> 2. I use backup mx's, my current solution probably could work in this >>> scenario but >>> the support mechanism behind it is *very* weak and I can't get a perfect >>> setup >>> working. Spam hits the primary for

Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-28 Thread Christopher Chan
Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Postfix can handle that. You can have multiple lookup tables/maps. They >> do not even have to be the same type of database. >> > > I guess I can leave that part upto Postfix, but I still need a antispam > addin... > spamassassin via spamass-milter. Fast, no compl

Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-28 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Postfix can handle that. You can have multiple lookup tables/maps. They >do not even have to be the same type of database. I guess I can leave that part upto Postfix, but I still need a antispam addin... I asked on the Postfix list a while ago whether multiple LDAP server lookups could be config

Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-28 Thread Christopher Chan
Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it > works very well except for the following two issues: > > 1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple > domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to ve

Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-28 Thread Ned Slider
Bowie Bailey wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >> 2. I use backup mx's, my current solution probably could work in this >> scenario but >> the support mechanism behind it is *very* weak and I can't get a perfect >> setup >> working. Spam hits the primary for a domain, gets blocked and then trie

Re: [CentOS] Antispam with Postfix

2009-09-28 Thread Bowie Bailey
Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it > works very well except for the following two issues: > > 1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple > domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to ve