Re: [CentOS] small window manager

2008-09-02 Thread Paul Bijnens
On 2008-09-02 14:07, John Kordash wrote: What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS, that has very small memory footprint? I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when not giving geometry options. No other requirements. You found twm's 'RandomPlacme

RE: [CentOS] small window manager

2008-09-02 Thread John Kordash
> What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS, > that has very small memory footprint? > > I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when > not giving geometry options. No other requirements. You found twm's 'RandomPlacment' unsuitable? -John

RE: [CentOS] small window manager

2008-09-02 Thread Geoff Galitz
I use XFCE for my resource starved environments (cluster simulations using virtualization environments). It works well and integrates nicely into the Centos deployments. -geoff Geoff Galitz Blankenheim NRW, Deutschland http://www.galitz.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CentOS] small window manager

2008-09-02 Thread Pintér Tibor
Paul Bijnens wrote: What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS, that has very small memory footprint? I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when not giving geometry options. No other requirements. dwm, fwm, xfce, fluxbox? ps: your signature is

Re: [CentOS] small window manager

2008-09-02 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:01 +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS, > that has very small memory footprint? > > I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when > not giving geometry options. No other requirements. Within C