On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Alain Terriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage under
> CentOS?
> http://www.coraid.com
> It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ?
It doesn't go all the way, but sure looks as interesting
Alain Terriault wrote:
> Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage
> under CentOS?
> http://www.coraid.com
> It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ?
I have one of those installed on CentOS 4.6 with 1TB of storage. I'm
sharing it between three servers. I c
>
> My personal guess (and probably more than a few others) is that Sun is
> interested in taking the clustering functionality that
> underlies Lustre
> and integrating it with ZFS for a future version of Solaris.
> Even if
> Sun stops supporting Lustre development on Linux, its GPL open source,
Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage
under CentOS?
http://www.coraid.com
It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ?
I$ilon could also be a option for petabytes storage
http://www.isilon.com/products/index.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To start I wish
Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
Lustre only runs on Linux. RH5 is fully supported. (And it works fine with
CentOS 5.)
My personal guess (and probably more than a few others) is that Sun is
interested in taking the clustering functionality that underlies Lustre
and integrating it with ZFS for a
Bent Terp wrote:
Lustre?
there's also the commercial IBrix Fusion distributed file system. I've
only seen demos and done a paper eval for a project that never
materialized, it looked very interesting, but our requirements shifted,
so we never got past the initial research stage... Its
Lustre only runs on Linux. RH5 is fully supported. (And it works fine with
CentOS 5.)
>
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As for file systems there is only really one for that scenario,
> > > GFS, as OCFSv1 only goes up to 8TB and OCFSv2 is
Bent Terp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for file systems there is only really one for that scenario,
> > GFS, as OCFSv1 only goes up to 8TB and OCFSv2 is still a
> > technology preview. Besides GFS is included in the distro!
>
> Lustr
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for file systems there is only really one for that scenario,
> GFS, as OCFSv1 only goes up to 8TB and OCFSv2 is still a
> technology preview. Besides GFS is included in the distro!
Lustre?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If there was a way to create a Linux (Centos) 100TB -
> 500TB or larger clustered file system with the nodes
> connected via infiniband that was easily manageable with
> throughput that can support multiple 10Gbps Ethernet
> connections I would be very interested.
C
10 matches
Mail list logo
