Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> Before CentOS 5 x86, I was using Scientific Linux 4 and they were
> keeping 4.x trees (e.g. 4.0, 4.1 etc) and for having an upgrade to the
> latest tree automatically, we were using a plug in or something
neither redhat nor us at CentOS intend to follow the sort of process
Karanbir Singh wrote:
yup, bit of a change with the upstream people adopting this whole
z-series thing, wherein they will now maintain branches for 5.1 even
when 5.2 is released.
over the next day or so, I shall try and get a document that explains
this whole thing.
Before CentOS 5 x86, I
fred smith wrote:
So there's been a change since Centos 4, then. (I'm fine with that, I
just didn't know it...). From my Centos4 box at work:
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 4.5 (Final)
Said machine was instaleld at Centos4 and kept updated with YUM.
yup, bit of a c
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 01:07:19PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> ># rpm -q centos-release
> >centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
>
> check your syslog, it will indicate what was installed and when.
>
> >Probably I was further confused by /etc/redhat-release:
> >
> ># cat /etc/r
On Dec 5, 2007 5:24 AM, fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I don't remember getting a huge bolus of updates, which is what I would
> have expected to constitute a 5.0==>5.1 transition.
For a minimal install, there were surprisingly few new packages for
5.0 => 5.1. Looking at my /var/log/y
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Try
yum upgrade
instead of yum update.
wont make much of a difference in this case, upgrade is just an alias of
update with the --obsoletes flag
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS maili
fred smith wrote:
# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
check your syslog, it will indicate what was installed and when.
Probably I was further confused by /etc/redhat-release:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Which is what the system is. For anyone wh
Try
yum upgrade
instead of yum update.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:43:13AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > I have read multipe messages here from people upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1,
> > presumably using "yum update" to do the deed.
> >
> > When I do "yum update" on my (I think) fully updated Centos 5 system I get
> >
fred smith wrote:
> I have read multipe messages here from people upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1,
> presumably using "yum update" to do the deed.
>
> When I do "yum update" on my (I think) fully updated Centos 5 system I get no
> updates.
>
> Am I just being impatient (i.e., the updates haven't yet b
I have read multipe messages here from people upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1,
presumably using "yum update" to do the deed.
When I do "yum update" on my (I think) fully updated Centos 5 system I get no
updates.
Am I just being impatient (i.e., the updates haven't yet been pushed out) or am
I
somehow
11 matches
Mail list logo
