On 7/31/07, David Hrbác( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, that did not come to my mind.
Keep in mind that some of the i386/i686 packages may interfere with
x86_64 builds. Multi-arch gets very interesting when you're building
software. You may have to remove some/all of them, or be very spec
Matt Hyclak napsal(a):
> Some programs are not available in 64-bit packages (e.g. openoffice). Those
> packages need 32-bit libraries to run, so you are seeing the necessary
> packages for those 32-bit apps.
>
> Matt
>
Thank you, that did not come to my mind.
David
__
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:38:42PM +0200, David Hrbá? enlightened us:
> I'm preparing a new x86_64 build machine and I'm looking at installed
> rpms. I have found a lot of packages are marked i386 or i686. I have
> even found I have two version of package installed:
> glibc-2.3.4-2.36-i686
> glibc-
Hi,
I'm preparing a new x86_64 build machine and I'm looking at installed
rpms. I have found a lot of packages are marked i386 or i686. I have
even found I have two version of package installed:
glibc-2.3.4-2.36-i686
glibc-2.3.4-2.36-x86_64
What's the reason in duplicity and why not all packages a
4 matches
Mail list logo
