On 22/06/2010 11:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:42:46 -0700:
>
>> No, that's fine, really. I was just pointing out that, for some
>> Internet-facing systems, this policy may be inadequate, due to the
>> fast-changing nature of the Internet.
>
> I disagree.
Florin Andrei wrote on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:42:46 -0700:
> No, that's fine, really. I was just pointing out that, for some
> Internet-facing systems, this policy may be inadequate, due to the
> fast-changing nature of the Internet.
I disagree. The included Postfix works just fine. You have a ver
On 06/18/2010 05:49 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 18/06/2010 22:28, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
>
> While you are doing that - also think about this : Red Hat have a
> policy, and they stick with it. Its something that works w
On 18/06/2010 23:19, John R Pierce wrote:
> isn't EL6 coming out soon ? beta 1 released in April,
afait ETA on el6 is august'ish this year. but C4 and C5 are still
maintained and in mass production *now*. If there is a clearcut problem
definition as this postfix issue is, then creating ( facil
On 18/06/2010 22:28, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
While you are doing that - also think about this : Red Hat have a
policy, and they stick with it. Its something that works well for them,
the ISVs around the base and its somethi
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On 06/18/2010 03:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> (reading the EL6 beta 1 release notes) EL6 will be based on 2.6.32,
>> use EXT4 by default, have XFS support (in 64bit builds), Apache
>> 2.2.14, gcc 4.4, samba 3.0, postgres 8.4, mysql 5.1
>
> and Pos
>
> Is anyone working on this? (No, not Fedora. That's not a server OS.)
>
When i find some package "old" i just get the SRPM from Fedora and i try
to compile it in CentOS (it's very fun!)
although CentOS/RHEL packages seems to be old, RH folks back-port
security / bugfix patches
I use fedor
Stephen Harris wrote:
> RHEL 2.1: Mar 2002 (AS), May 2003 (ES)
> RHEL 3: Oct 2003
> RHEL 4: Feb 2005
> RHEL 5: Mar 2007
> RHEL 6: ??? (previous Beta's have been 5-6 months...)
>
> Funky; in June 2006 RHEL claimed they would slow their release schedule to
> every 2 years (rather than 18 months). O
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:02:10PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> The door's wide open for someone with the energy to put together a server
> distro based on CentOS but with modern versions of essential daemons. Yes,
Or wait for RedHat^WCentOS 6, which can't be too far out...
RHEL 2.1: Mar 2002 (A
On 06/18/2010 03:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> (reading the EL6 beta 1 release notes) EL6 will be based on 2.6.32, use
> EXT4 by default, have XFS support (in 64bit builds), Apache 2.2.14, gcc
> 4.4, samba 3.0, postgres 8.4, mysql 5.1
and Postfix 2.6.5. Not bad. I could live with that.
--
Flor
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>
>> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
>>
>
> To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
> What
> a golden month for mail dae
On 6/18/2010 5:02 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
>
> To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
> What
> a golden month for mail daemons that was.
>
> The door's wide open for someone with
On 06/18/2010 03:02 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
> What
> a golden month for mail daemons that was.
lol
> The door's wide open for someone with the energy to put together a server
> distro based on CentOS but with mode
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
What
a golden month for mail daemons that was.
The door's wide open for some
If you deliver more than a few emails to the outside world, especially
if a good portion of those go to Yahoo, you may want to read this message:
http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=127689518629249&w=2
Actually, read the whole thread, it's interesting and the discussion
still continues:
http:/
15 matches
Mail list logo
