From: Peter Kjellström
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 01:48:13 PM Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> > Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>> If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
> HP is moving from the old cciss d
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 01:48:13 PM Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
> > Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>
> If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
HP is moving from the old cciss driver to the new hpsa driver. O
On 10/25/11 4:48 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> > Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>> >
> If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
yes, says as much on that lspci -v output I pasted earlier tonight in
this thre
On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
> Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>
If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
On 10/25/11 3:20 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Indeed, nice specs.
> How much does it cost...?
it was bundled with a DL180G6 server, I'd have to dig out the quotes to
find the controller price, but I'm seeming to remember about $500
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz c
From: John R Pierce
> On 10/25/11 2:16 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the
> classical /dev/cciss/c0d*...
>> Is the P411 a fake raid?
>
> no, its a seriously fast pci-e SAS2 hardware raid. the physical
> devices don't show at all.
On 10/25/11 2:16 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the
> classical /dev/cciss/c0d*...
> Is the P411 a fake raid?
no, its a seriously fast pci-e SAS2 hardware raid. the physical
devices don't show at all. it has 1GB of writeback cache th
From: John R Pierce
> On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
> P411 raid controller ...
> Disk Name: /dev/sdc
> ...
Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the
classical /dev/cciss/c0d*...
Is the P411 a fake raid?
JD
On 10/23/11 4:00 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> Didn't parted have issues with alignment? Here are two links with info
> about alignment of SSDs which I found helpful in the past:
parted handles alignment as well or better than fdisk, which that blog
suggested using.
anyways, I have it formatted and
On 10/23/2011 09:48 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/23/11 12:23 AM, Ken godee wrote:
>> Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.
>
> with parted at least, I'm stuck with a vicious circle that won't let me
> align the data right?
Didn't parted have issues with alignment? Here are two links w
On 10/23/11 12:23 AM, Ken godee wrote:
> Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.
with parted at least, I'm stuck with a vicious circle that won't let me
align the data right?
# parted /dev/sdc
GNU Parted 2.1
Using /dev/sdc
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(pa
Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.
On 10/23/2011 12:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
> P411 raid controller (I believe this is a rebranded LSI megaraid with HP
> firmware) and am trying to format them for best rand
On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
P411 raid controller (I believe this is a rebranded LSI megaraid with HP
firmware) and am trying to format them for best random IO performance
with something like postgresql.
so, I used the raid command tool to build a raid
13 matches
Mail list logo
