Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Friday 17 February 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 > Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaining > LifeTime(hours) LBA > _of_first_error > # 1 Extended offlineCompleted without error 00% 2536 > - > # 2 Short offl

Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Friday 17 February 2012, Andrzej Szymański wrote: > As the location and contents of this sector are quite hard to find, > the simplest, but the most troublesome way of solving the problem is > moving all data away from this disk, writing the whole surface with > zeros (dd) and moving the data

Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread m . roth
Mike VanHorn wrote: > > FWIW, on some of my workstations, when I have gotten the "sector pending" > messages, I have been able to take the drive out and run the > manufacturer's diagnostics on it (in my case, Seatools), and that fixed > some things and I haven't had any issues since. > Well, since

Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread Andrzej Szymański
W dniu 2012-02-17 21:25, m.r...@5-cent.us pisze: > Mike Burger wrote: > Ok, but my thinking was, first, that after the fsck, the system wouldn't > try to write to the bad sector, thus not provoking smart. The more > annoying thing is that I don't understand why smartctl doesn't give the > same info

Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread Mike VanHorn
FWIW, on some of my workstations, when I have gotten the "sector pending" messages, I have been able to take the drive out and run the manufacturer's diagnostics on it (in my case, Seatools), and that fixed some things and I haven't had any issues since. --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems A

Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread m . roth
Mike Burger wrote: > >> A few weeks ago, one of my servers started complaining, via smartd, that >> one drive had one unreadable sector. I umounted it, and ran an fsck -c, >> then remounted it. Error didn't go away. Now, what's really annoying is >> that I've gotten back to it today, and it's repor

Re: [CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread Mike Burger
> A few weeks ago, one of my servers started complaining, via smartd, that > one drive had one unreadable sector. I umounted it, and ran an fsck -c, > then remounted it. Error didn't go away. Now, what's really annoying is > that I've gotten back to it today, and it's reporting the problem, as it

[CentOS] smartd and smartctl

2012-02-17 Thread m . roth
A few weeks ago, one of my servers started complaining, via smartd, that one drive had one unreadable sector. I umounted it, and ran an fsck -c, then remounted it. Error didn't go away. Now, what's really annoying is that I've gotten back to it today, and it's reporting the problem, as it has for w