From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 3, 2009 00:25
> From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 19:40
> > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34
> > >
> > > If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to
> > > do special routing, I believe there will be
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 19:40
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34
> >
> > If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to
> > do special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply
> > that sender_based_routing patch. They
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34
>
> If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to do
> special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply that
> sender_based_routing patch. They cannot share the same mailertable
> lookups. Another table loo
>> Well, give the ricker hack a try.
>>
>
> Will do but I want to understand it a bit better before I do.
>
>
Of course. Therefore the question I posed below.
>> Is that sendmail box also the mx for the domains concerned?
>>
>
> Currently yes but I will be changing the MX for the one
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 18:27
>
> For those that might be interested I have found one other alternative
> called Smart Table available at:
>
> http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/smarttab.html
>
> However it is for sendmail 8.5+ and will not work w
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 18:36
>
> You are running 8.13.x?
Yes.
8.13.1 on our primary development server (CentOS 4.8) which is also
our primary mail server.
8.13.8 on our primary production server (RHEL 5.3 soon to be 5.4)
which is the alternate mail server that I was look
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
>
>>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You wi
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
>
> > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
> >
> >
> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
> sendmail.cf after ap
From: Ron Loftin Sent: September 2, 2009 11:48
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
> > >
> > > I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of
> > > sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 whil
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
>>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebui
> The problem here is that my users are a
> rather uncooperative bunch and tend to think that they know better on
> what should be done and then go off and do things their way. And this
> attitude starts at the top and works its way down. Worse yet some of
> this has now become company policy
I ha
From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 22:35
>
> You can use SMART_HOST to send the mail from any single host
> through a specified relay.
Single host and multiple domains so no go here.
> If the same machine is sending for more than one domain, you may be
> able to configure the applicatio
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
> > > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> > > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
> > >
> > >
> > Looks like it is my t
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
> > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
> >
> >
> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
> sendmail.cf after apply
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
[ ... ]
> Hi Again
>
> Unless I am completely confused won't using mailer table with the option
>
> .domain smtp:[gateway.domain]
>
> where .domain is the domain you are concerned with do what you wish ?
For using a mailertable rule the domain MUST NOT b
John R Pierce wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
>> se
Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>
>>
>>
> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
> sendmail.cf after applying this hack.
>
> http:/
> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>
>
Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
sendmail.cf after applying this hack.
http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_ba
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
> You are correct. I was referring to routing email _from_ one of our
> domain names through a separate mail server then out to the 'net.
> Upon rereading the mailertable doc it appears that this is for routing
> email _to_ on of our domain names so it will not work fo
Les Mikesell wrote:
> "What I would like to do is route (relay?) any outgoing emails that are
> from emails addresses using only one of those domains to a separate
> SMPT server."
>
> Which didn't sound like routing _to_ one of the domains. So maybe neither
> approach will work.
>
yeah, most
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 21:18
>
>> But what it actually said was:
>>
>> "What I would like to do is route (relay?) any outgoing emails that
>> are from emails addresses using only one of those domains to a
>> separate SMPT server."
>>
>> Which didn'
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>
>
> Could a milter do it?
>
No idea. I do not know if the milter interface supports changing the
routing...it would have to be abl
From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 21:18
>
> But what it actually said was:
>
> "What I would like to do is route (relay?) any outgoing emails that
> are from emails addresses using only one of those domains to a
> separate SMPT server."
>
> Which didn't sound like routing _to_ one of th
> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
Could a milter do it?
Maybe capture all outbound messages and stop them from
processing on the original server. Next, create an smtp
session to the new outbound s
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13
>
> Hi All:
>
> I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails.
> I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come
> close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the
> right direction
Clint Dilks wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>>
>>> From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>>>
I believe mailertable is what you want.
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
>>> I do believe you are right. I had looked at th
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
>> From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>>
>>> I believe mailertable is what you want.
>>>
>>> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
>>>
>> I do believe you are right. I had looked at that before but for some
>> reas
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>> I believe mailertable is what you want.
>>
>> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
>
> I do believe you are right. I had looked at that before but for some
> reason my brain was stuck on seeing so much about inc
From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>
> I believe mailertable is what you want.
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
I do believe you are right. I had looked at that before but for some
reason my brain was stuck on seeing so much about incoming emails that
I read that in
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13
>
> Hi All:
>
> I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails.
> I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come
> close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the
> right direction
CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13
Hi All:
I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails.
I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come
close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the
right direction I would greatly appreciate it.
We curre
31 matches
Mail list logo
