>> 2. Is there a page like Ubuntu's CVE Tracker site where it shows the
>> CVE, the package name, and the status
>
> Red Hat (CentOS's upsream) posts advisories for these sorts of things:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2969
>
> This is the security advisory for this package.
Yeah,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:04:52AM +, Boushy, Phillip wrote:
> 1. Is there a 11.0.8 update for java-11-openjdk-devel available for
> CentOS 7?
No, but it's in the process of being built and distributed. It's been
released in RHEL and I suspect the GRUB2/shim/kernel security issue is
taking so
Am 31.07.20 um 02:04 schrieb Boushy, Phillip:
I have a docker image based off centos:7 with java-11-openjdk-devel.
It appears that the current java-11-openjdk-devel available in the CentOS 7 Yum
repo is 1:11.0.7.10-4.el7_8
11.0.7 is reported to have some high vulnerabilities RHSA-2020:2969 th
I have a docker image based off centos:7 with java-11-openjdk-devel.
It appears that the current java-11-openjdk-devel available in the CentOS 7 Yum
repo is 1:11.0.7.10-4.el7_8
11.0.7 is reported to have some high vulnerabilities RHSA-2020:2969 that are
fixed in 11.0.8, but 11.0.8 is not avail
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Two ideas:
>
> 1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a "technology preview" for CentOS 6.6, or so
> this article claims
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/CentOS-6-6-Features-OpenJDK-8-Support-463730.shtml
>
> 2. Since Oracle Linux is userland-binar
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Arun Gupta wrote:
> Do you know the timelines by which it will be included in CentOS 7.0 ?
>
> Any place where a binary build can be downloaded ?
>
Two ideas:
1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a "technology preview" for CentOS 6.6, or so
this article claims
http://n
On 04/21/2010 01:29 PM, Agile Aspect wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Gordon Messmer
>
>> Are you confusing OpenJDK with gcj?
>>
> GCJ produces objects and runs roughly 10 times faster then either
> OpenJDK or Sun's JDK.
>
Citation?
>> It sounds that way.
>>
> The s
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Gordon Messmer
>
> Are you confusing OpenJDK with gcj?
GCJ produces objects and runs roughly 10 times faster then either
OpenJDK or Sun's JDK.
> It sounds that way.
The sound must be coming from the voices in your head.
--
Enjoy global warming while it la
On 04/15/2010 08:44 PM, Agile Aspect wrote:
>
> RedHat has acknowleged that Sun's JDK is faster - despite the fact
> OpenJDK is native.
>
Are you confusing OpenJDK with gcj? It sounds that way.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> RedHat has acknowleged that Sun's JDK is faster - despite the fact
>> OpenJDK is native. Since it's native, it also means it's not platform
>> independent (in the sense of compile once run anywhere.)
>
> What do you mean "is native" ?
>
> The JDK (or rather the JVM) is n
On Friday, April 16, 2010 02:54 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> RedHat has acknowleged that Sun's JDK is faster - despite the fact
>> OpenJDK is native. Since it's native, it also means it's not platform
>> independent (in the sense of compile once run anywhere.)
>
> What do you mean "is native" ?
I
> RedHat has acknowleged that Sun's JDK is faster - despite the fact
> OpenJDK is native. Since it's native, it also means it's not platform
> independent (in the sense of compile once run anywhere.)
What do you mean "is native" ?
The JDK (or rather the JVM) is native on all OS, since it is the l
On Friday, April 16, 2010 11:44 AM, Agile Aspect wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's?
>
> RedHat has acknowleged that Sun's JDK is faster - despite the fact
> OpenJDK is nati
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's?
>
> cheers,
>
> Christopher
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailma
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 02:26 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/4/14 Christopher Chan:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's?
>
> it's at least missing webstart ?
>
Hmm, not sure if that is crucial to Corendal's operation...I guess I
will ju
2010/4/14 Christopher Chan :
> Hi all,
>
> Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's?
it's at least missing webstart ?
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's?
cheers,
Christopher
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 10/15/2009 05:01 PM:
> Hey, folks,
>
> yum is telling me that I need to update openjdk on several servers.
> HOWEVER, they've all got openjdk-plugin installed, and yum doesn't want
> to update, and tells me there's no openjdk-plugin package to install, at
> least for 5.
Hey, folks,
yum is telling me that I need to update openjdk on several servers.
HOWEVER, they've all got openjdk-plugin installed, and yum doesn't want
to update, and tells me there's no openjdk-plugin package to install, at
least for 5.3.
What I see, googling, is the workaround is to install
Joe Pruett wrote:
> has anyone replaced the sun jdk with the new openjdk and had any issues?
> i had forgotten it was now in 5.3 until the errata announcement came
> through.
I was going to do that for OpenNMS, but they say it is too old a version
(they need something fixed in b14 or higher
has anyone replaced the sun jdk with the new openjdk and had any issues?
i had forgotten it was now in 5.3 until the errata announcement came
through.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
21 matches
Mail list logo
