Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Are you sure you read the OP's message(s)? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Agile Aspect
> > "machines" do not have MX records, domains have MX records. MX records are associated with the domain but point to machines with IP addresses running a MTA. If you don't assign a IP address of a machine with a MTA to the MX record, then your MX record is useless. It's essential for fault to

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jerry Geis wrote on Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:05:35 -0500: > All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name. "machines" do not have MX records, domains have MX records. I think you told your provider some wrong information and that's why they set it up wrong. > > It is a big

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Jerry Geis wrote: > > > All three machines have the same FQDN. > something like A.mydomain.com, B.mydomain.com, C.mydomain.com > > The IP numbers are X.Y.Z.170, .171 and .172 > > All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name. > > It is a big deal to request changes from

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread John R Pierce
Jerry Geis wrote: > MAIL_HUB does the trick - thanks that was what I was looking for. > you still should delete the extra MX records from the DNS ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Jerry Geis
MAIL_HUB does the trick - thanks that was what I was looking for. jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Michel van Deventer
Hi, > All three machines have the same FQDN. > something like A.mydomain.com, B.mydomain.com, C.mydomain.com No, they don't have the same fqdn, the fqdn includes the hostname. > > The IP numbers are X.Y.Z.170, .171 and .172 > > All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Jerry Geis
the message. > > - Rick > > Original Message > >> Date: Friday, January 01, 2010 02:27:12 PM -0500 >> From: Jerry Geis >> To: CentOS ML >> Subject: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more >> > servers

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi all, > > I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with > incoming mail. > > I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them machine > names all > part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming emails are > being > round ro

[CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

2010-01-01 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi all, I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with incoming mail. I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them machine names all part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming emails are being round robined to all three machines. At this