On 11/28/2011 07:41 PM, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community
>> string "public" even if I don't have it
>> defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
> "public" even if I don't have it
> defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
> timeout. See example below.
> ...
> rocommunity nob
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
"public" even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout. See example below.
...
rocommunity nobody 127.0.0.1
...
[root@L703108 pgsql]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Bob p...@nle wrote:
> Hello Centos People,
>
> I have a CentOS 5.3 box that had a total of 5 ethernet cards in it. It
> functions to share an internet connection with 4 different subnets. All
> works fine, except I'm noticing that my MRTG traffic graphs are wrong
Hello Centos People,
I have a CentOS 5.3 box that had a total of 5 ethernet cards in it. It
functions to share an internet connection with 4 different subnets. All
works fine, except I'm noticing that my MRTG traffic graphs are wrong.
Further digging with snmpwalk reveal that the order of th
I have a bunch of centos 5.2 boxes.
I'm trying to run smtp on all of them.
Using indentical net-snmp configuration files.
/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
com2sec notConfigUser localhost smssnmp
com2sec notConfigUser 10.1.1.0/24 smssnmp
group notConfigGroup v1 notConfigUs
CentOS 5 uses the net-snmp package.
I am used to the similar but different snmpd package.
They appear to have different conventions about what can be used as a
"community string".
And when net-snmp sees a community string it doesn't like, it just fails
silently without
giving an error message.
I
David Hrbáč wrote:
> Hi,
> I guess, net-snmp should have dependency set to the latest net-snmp-libs.
> Regards,
> David
I agree, however we do not make technical changes to SPEC files. This
is an upstream issue.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I guess, net-snmp should have dependency set to the latest net-snmp-libs.
Regards,
David
[root@ ~]# yum update net-snmp
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Re
9 matches
Mail list logo
