Ray Leventhal wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:29:09 -0400:
> Should Mailscanner's threshold be addressed or is there something I'm
> missing here?
The threshold is ok. What happened is that this message included phishing
text that clamd tripped on. You want to put *all* your servers on the
MailSc
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009 17:29:09 Ray Leventhal wrote:
>
>> So while I now understand that they've been running on schedule and why
>> I've not been seeing them...I still am in a bit of a quandry as I would
>> *like* to receive them.
>>
>> Should Mailscanner's threshold be a
On Friday 21 August 2009 17:29:09 Ray Leventhal wrote:
>
> So while I now understand that they've been running on schedule and why
> I've not been seeing them...I still am in a bit of a quandry as I would
> *like* to receive them.
>
> Should Mailscanner's threshold be addressed or is there somethin
Ray Leventhal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> # uname -a Linux obfuscated.example.com 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue
> Aug 4 20:23:34 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> I noticed a few days ago that I'm not getting my logwatch emails to the
> root account any longer, and while I've definitely been applying up
4 matches
Mail list logo