On 05/11/2010 07:09 PM, a arias wrote:
>
> I wonder if I am the only one who is experiencing this. What could
> have caused this?
>
Look for other files that would otherwise be the targets of a symlink:
# ls /usr/lib64/libfreebl3*
It's normal for /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so to not be a symlink. I
Zyla, that did not work either.
I was able to work around this by doing the following:
mv /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so.0.1; ln -snf
/usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so.0.1 /usr/lib64/libfreel3.so
I wonder if I am the only one who is experiencing this. What could have
caused this?
Tha
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:50:05PM -0400, a arias wrote:
> That did not work. It fact, i got the following message during the yum
> reinstall process:
>
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
According to `yum deplist glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.3.x86_64' you may also try
with r
That did not work. It fact, i got the following message during the yum
reinstall process:
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Dominik Zyla wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:22:05PM -0400, a arias wrote:
> > I have been getting the
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:22:05PM -0400, a arias wrote:
> I have been getting the following error when trying to run ldconfig:
>
>
> ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
>
>
> # ll /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 312336 Mar 28 11:13 /usr/li
I have been getting the following error when trying to run ldconfig:
ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
# ll /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 312336 Mar 28 11:13 /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so
I've used "yum whatprovides /usr/lib64/libfreeb13.so" to determine t
6 matches
Mail list logo
