Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Hrbáč wrote: > Akemi Yagi napsal(a): >> You never had this problem under 2.6.18-8.1.14 ? That is curious. I >> do not know exactly how far back this started happening, but it must >> be quite sometime ago. Guess Johnny can tell us more. >> > Yes, I have pointed it out in the very first pos

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-30 Thread David Hrbáč
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > You never had this problem under 2.6.18-8.1.14 ? That is curious. I > do not know exactly how far back this started happening, but it must > be quite sometime ago. Guess Johnny can tell us more. > > Akemi Yes, I have pointed it out in the very first post. A new ICH9 patc

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/30/07, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > > > I will wait for 5.1 because there is some possibility that this issue > > is resolved in the newer kernel. In the meantime, the best workaround > > is to disable signmodules or to use mock. > > > > Akemi > > Or build

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-29 Thread David Hrbáč
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > I will wait for 5.1 because there is some possibility that this issue > is resolved in the newer kernel. In the meantime, the best workaround > is to disable signmodules or to use mock. > > Akemi Or build under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14 :o) David __

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-29 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/29/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/29/07, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But wait for a while. I do not want to waste your time and your > cputime. I realize I need to do more testing before asking others. > As you know more than anyone else, these things take

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-29 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/29/07, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > >> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel/linux-2.6-execshield.patch?root=extras&rev=1.76&view=log > > I did my testing with the latest CentOS kernel-2.6.18-8.1.1

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-29 Thread David Hrbáč
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): >> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel/linux-2.6-execshield.patch?root=extras&rev=1.76&view=log > I did my testing with the latest CentOS kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15.el5.i686. I mean linux-2.6-execshield.patch revision as on http://cvs.fedora.redhat.

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-29 Thread Akemi Yagi
g > Tanks, > David I did my testing with the latest CentOS kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15.el5.i686. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-29 Thread David Hrbáč
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > This particular problem has been known for a while, at least since > FC6, and reported in: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213974 > > As noted in that report (right after Johnny's comment), I suspect it > shares the same root cause as another bug #246623 fi

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/28/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Hrbáč wrote: > > Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > >> Change *all* signmodules to zero as a workround. > >> > >> %define signmodules 0 > >> > >> It would go through then. Or else, build in mock. According to > >> Johnny, the modsign problem does

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-28 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Hrbáč wrote: > Akemi Yagi napsal(a): >> Change *all* signmodules to zero as a workround. >> >> %define signmodules 0 >> >> It would go through then. Or else, build in mock. According to >> Johnny, the modsign problem does not occur in mock. >> >> Akemi > > OK, thanks. > D. I specifically

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-27 Thread David Hrbáč
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > Change *all* signmodules to zero as a workround. > > %define signmodules 0 > > It would go through then. Or else, build in mock. According to > Johnny, the modsign problem does not occur in mock. > > Akemi OK, thanks. D. ___

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/27/07, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > > I can certainly try it on my c5-i686 VM. But at which step does it > > segfault? Does it have to do with modsigning? > > > > Akemi > > As far as I remember yes. > D. Change *all* signmodules to zero as a workround.

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-27 Thread David Hrbáč
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): > I can certainly try it on my c5-i686 VM. But at which step does it > segfault? Does it have to do with modsigning? > > Akemi As far as I remember yes. D. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/27/07, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > It seems to me, that kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 is maybe not ok. I have been > trying to rebuild my patched kernel RPMS in virtual machine running i686 > kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15. It had failed for the three times with > segmentation fault. First ru

[CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15

2007-10-27 Thread David Hrbáč
Hi, It seems to me, that kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 is maybe not ok. I have been trying to rebuild my patched kernel RPMS in virtual machine running i686 kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15. It had failed for the three times with segmentation fault. First run under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14 went smoothly. So, maybe it's a k