Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread Lars Hecking
> Ok, something *just* hit me, and I checked: sure enough, that link was > under amd64, and this new box is running Xeons. Now, the other admin says > they're as compatible as any i386 instruction set. > > And locate tells me the only libnpjp2.so is under amd64 > > So, I'm stumped. I have

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread Keith Roberts
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > Subject: Re: [CentOS] java annoyances > > B.J. McClure wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:29 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Fresh install on a brand new box (

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread m . roth
B.J. McClure wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:29 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Fresh install on a brand new box (Dell Precision 3500) of 5.6. I install >> Sun java-1.6.0_26-b03, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build >> 20.1-b02, >> mixed mode) >> Folks, I appreciate the efforts to help

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread B.J. McClure
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:29 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Fresh install on a brand new box (Dell Precision 3500) of 5.6. I install > Sun java-1.6.0_26-b03, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02, > mixed mode) > > A followup: from Oracle's website, at >

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> please watch out for i386/x86_64 differences, and replace path where >>> needed. >> >> Ok, this used to be, for i386. At any rate, that's not in the Sun >> package, as released via RHN. > > This is what is now on my CentOS 5.6 64-bit: > > use

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> please watch out for i386/x86_64 differences, and replace path where >> needed. > > Ok, this used to be, for i386. At any rate, that's not in the Sun package, > as released via RHN. > >mark This is what is now on my CentOS 5.6 64-bit: use libnpjp2.so from /usr

[CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread m . roth
Fresh install on a brand new box (Dell Precision 3500) of 5.6. I install Sun java-1.6.0_26-b03, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode) A followup: from Oracle's website, at : Excerpt: Not

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Fresh install on a brand new box (Dell Precision 3500) of 5.6. I install >> Sun java-1.6.0_26-b03, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build >> 20.1-b02, >> mixed mode) >> >> Then >> ln -s >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0.26.x86_64/jre/lib/

Re: [CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Fresh install on a brand new box (Dell Precision 3500) of 5.6. I install > Sun java-1.6.0_26-b03, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02, > mixed mode) > > Then > ln -s > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0.26.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so > /usr/lib64/mozilla

[CentOS] java annoyances

2011-07-08 Thread m . roth
Fresh install on a brand new box (Dell Precision 3500) of 5.6. I install Sun java-1.6.0_26-b03, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode) Then ln -s /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0.26.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins about:plugins shows java enabl