Re: [CentOS] hw raid 10 with 4 disc, recomended partitiontable

2007-08-14 Thread kai
Additional question: When the installer is setting the swap it sets it to be 1984MB, the memory is 4096 in to banks? How come? Has this something to do with the raid 1+0 Jim Perrin wrote: On 8/13/07, kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What would be a good recommended partition table for a serv

Re: [CentOS] hw raid 10 with 4 disc, recomended partitiontable

2007-08-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Jim Perrin wrote: > /tmp is good to split out for noexec mounts. I do this as another > layer to security for my webservers. It'll by no means stop attacks, > but every little bit helps, and I like to make my servers as > uninviting to maladjusted folks as I can. Does this work with logrotate by n

Re: [CentOS] hw raid 10 with 4 disc, recomended partitiontable

2007-08-13 Thread Feizhou
kai wrote: I am familiar with centos and this forum, and have some rhel / centos questions. Therefore I'm asking the question here I am about to install rhel4.5 on a hp dl380 with 4 disc's. The standard rhel installation installers all in one partition? Will there be any advantage of splittin

Re: [CentOS] hw raid 10 with 4 disc, recomended partitiontable

2007-08-13 Thread Jim Perrin
On 8/13/07, kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am familiar with centos and this forum, and have some rhel / centos > questions. Therefore I'm asking the question here > > I am about to install rhel4.5 on a hp dl380 with 4 disc's. The standard > rhel installation installers all in one partition? > W

[CentOS] hw raid 10 with 4 disc, recomended partitiontable

2007-08-13 Thread kai
I am familiar with centos and this forum, and have some rhel / centos questions. Therefore I'm asking the question here I am about to install rhel4.5 on a hp dl380 with 4 disc's. The standard rhel installation installers all in one partition? Will there be any advantage of splitting the file s