Le 16/04/2017 à 22:46, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
> That means loading gnome. I use Xfce. Much better battery life with Xfce.
On a side note (from a Vim user), Geany works perfectly under Xfce and
has no weird GNOME dependencies. I know because I maintain an
Xfce-centered distribution. (https://
On 04/16/2017 04:37 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:39 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!"
And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany.
Gedit works for me - webpages, PHP, i
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:39 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!"
> And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany.
Gedit works for me - webpages, PHP, init (with Vi) et cetera.
--
Regards,
On 04/13/2017 03:01 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like
eclipse,
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
> On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
> >> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of th
On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like
eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor.
>
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like
eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor.
mark "my
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like
>>> eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor.
>>>
>>>mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!"
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like
>> eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor.
>>
>>mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!"
>
> And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Ge
On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse,
that
needs 2GB to run... for an editor.
mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!"
And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany.
Using a editor that und
s"
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:08:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)
Andrew Holway wrote:
>>
>> Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it
>> that way before
>>
> Between the early 1990's and early
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 12/04/2017 à 19:41, Andrew Holway a écrit :
> > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went
> > from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for
> > things like init were foc
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:41:33PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote:
> >
> > Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it
> > that way before
> >
>
> Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went
> from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:59:41 -0500 (CDT)
"Valeri Galtsev" wrote:
> On Wed, April 12, 2017 2:39 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6
> >>> years down
> >>> the road L
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:25:52PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/12/2017 12:39 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> > I have been told that Windows developers were taught not to
> >optimize their code for memory/cpu/etc since those could be solved by
> >throwing more hardware at it. Instead the
On 4/12/2017 12:39 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I have been told that Windows developers were taught not to
optimize their code for memory/cpu/etc since those could be solved by
throwing more hardware at it. Instead they should make clean readable
code. Not claiming that is exclusive to Win
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway
> wrote:
>>>
>>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years
>>> down the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing
about
>>> Windows.
>
>> All in the name of progress..
>
> I
On Wed, April 12, 2017 2:39 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway
> wrote:
>>>
>>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years
>>> down
>>> the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about
>>> Windows.
>>>
>>
>>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>>
>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years down
>> the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about
>> Windows.
>>
>
> All in the name of progress..
I have been told that Windows deve
>
> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years down
> the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about
> Windows.
>
All in the name of progress..
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.cent
On Wed, April 12, 2017 1:31 pm, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 12/04/2017 à 19:41, Andrew Holway a écrit :
>> Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory
went
>> from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made
for
>> things like init were focussed on this
Le 12/04/2017 à 19:41, Andrew Holway a écrit :
> Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went
> from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for
> things like init were focussed on this. In 1995 is was common for server
> platforms to have 32Mb
Andrew Holway wrote:
>>
>> Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it
>> that way before
>>
> Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went
> from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for
> things like init wer
>
> Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it
> that way before
>
Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went
from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for
things like init were focussed on this. In 1995 is
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Wed, April 12, 2017 8:07 am, Alice Wonder wrote:
>> On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
>>> Why don't we discuss something ***less***
>>> controversial, like politics or religion?
>>
>> Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm
>> always
On Wed, April 12, 2017 8:07 am, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
>> Why don't we discuss something ***less***
>> controversial, like politics or religion?
>>
>
> Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm
> always reminded of some TV clip
On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
Why don't we discuss something ***less*** controversial, like
politics or religion?
Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm
always reminded of some TV clip I saw when I was young and can't place
of a bunch of old peopl
27 matches
Mail list logo
