On 03/21/2016 10:18 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
However, in this case the host won't have addresses on (based on my above
correction) either br2 or br3. It does sound, though, like having
enp1so, enp1s0.2, and enpe1s0.3 in the 'DMZ' zone means that filtering
rules on the host will affect inbound traf
--On Monday, March 21, 2016 08:57:59 AM -0700 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional
>> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes
>
> On a purely subjective note: I think that's
On 21.03.2016 16:57, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional
>> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes
>
> On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the
>
On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional
services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes
On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the
primary benefits of virtualization and other contain
I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM,
VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would
appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar
configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if
a current configuration is
5 matches
Mail list logo
