I have fas account, Do I access to developer program?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:17 PM, wrote:
> The nice one I was looking at last year, before the turkey with Them told
> me "sorry, it was too late to get that, here, take this, it's good...",
> was in the $2k-$2700 range, an actual workstation, 7?00 model, NVidia
> video card, reasonable memory.
h
Peter Q. wrote:
> it's sounds good!
>
> What about price?
> On Apr 12, 2016 2:56 PM, "Lamar Owen" wrote:
>
>> You can get RHEL on Dell Precision mobile workstations. Laptops, just
>> higher end.
They're not outrageous, for business-class machines; they're more than
consumer-grade, but that is, g
it's sounds good!
What about price?
On Apr 12, 2016 2:56 PM, "Lamar Owen" wrote:
> You can get RHEL on Dell Precision mobile workstations. Laptops, just
> higher end.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
You can get RHEL on Dell Precision mobile workstations. Laptops, just higher
end.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dell provides linux laptops and lenovo too..
Eero
12.4.2016 10.39 ip. kirjoitti:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, April 12, 2016 1:43 pm, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > In US you can buy some laptops without MS Windows OS (read: with Linux,
> > most likely Ubuntu) from some small manufac
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Tue, April 12, 2016 1:43 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> In US you can buy some laptops without MS Windows OS (read: with Linux,
> most likely Ubuntu) from some small manufacturers... I believe, one
I *think* you can buy Dell laptops with no o/s.
mark
On Tue, April 12, 2016 1:43 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> I refuse to do anything at all on a Microsoft machine. I feel ill when I
> see the M$ screens and remember the countless months of my life
> frustratingly wasted trying to get M$ crap to work. Centos is true
> liberation and how com
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 09:44 -0400, Peter Larsen wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 11:55 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Me ? Well I am staying on C6 :-)
> That's why we have choice. This is not the Microsoft "everyone has to
> upgrade to Windows 10 like it or not" mentality. CentOS still has a
> lot of th
On 04/05/2016 11:55 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 08:16 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>>> What matters for the 'free' Red Hat software is ***ONLY*** Red Hat's
>>> stated terms and conditions - definitely not what someon
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 08:16 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> >
> > What matters for the 'free' Red Hat software is ***ONLY*** Red Hat's
> > stated terms and conditions - definitely not what someone else has
> > put on a web site.
> Here is
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> What matters for the 'free' Red Hat software is ***ONLY*** Red Hat's
> stated terms and conditions - definitely not what what someone else has
> put on a web site.
>
> Here is the link:
https://developers.redhat.com/terms-and-conditions/
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 11:17 +0200, Maikel van Leeuwen wrote:
> Techopedia explains Production Server
>
> A production server is the core server on which any website or Web
> application is being hosted and accessed by users. It is part of the
> entire software and application development env
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 07:55 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Production means you are benefiting from running server in any form.
> Making money is only one form of benefit. The rest are hard to list
> without knowing what exactly you do but the general approach in court
> would be: you will not be
On 5 April 2016 at 13:31, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2016-04-04, Timothy Murphy
> wrote:
> > I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, and downloaded the
> > ISO, though I haven't run it.
> >
> > What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> I think it's an excellent opportunity for de
On Tue, April 5, 2016 4:06 am, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>>
>>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
>> You
On 2016-04-04, Timothy Murphy
wrote:
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, and downloaded the
> ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
I think it's an excellent opportunity for developers, and for the simply
curious.
>
> The registration wit
Am 05.04.2016 um 11:06 schrieb Timothy Murphy :
> I run CentOS on two home servers (in different countries),
> and have no ambition to make money from them,
> which I take is the meaning of "production" in this context.
>
> Surely there must be many CentOS users like me?
> I found puzzling the sug
On 04/05/2016 11:06 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>>
>>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>> You need read
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>
>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
> You need read the usage license.
I glanced through this before dow
On 4/4/2016 7:22 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training
for rhce / rhcsa exam..
it also helps development groups in big corporate environments as they
won't have to budget and pay annual subscription fees to maintain their
developm
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As things stand, you can signup for a Red Hat Developer Subscription for
> free to get full access
> to all Red Hat products as a developer. Yes, you cannot deploy Red Hat
> products in production
> with this subscription but an
On Mon, April 4, 2016 9:25 am, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
and downloaded the ISO, though I haven
And (big) commercial vendors/users always prefer RHEL as it commercially
supported platform.
--
Eero
2016-04-04 17:25 GMT+03:00 Digimer :
> On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>>
>>> What do CentOS users think of Redh
On 4 April 2016 at 15:22, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training
> for rhce / rhcsa exam..
>
>
Note that this also gives access to the Red Hat Knowledgebase and to beta
downloads both of which can be useful for any CentOS sysadmin.
__
Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training
for rhce / rhcsa exam..
br,
--
Eero
2016-04-04 17:16 GMT+03:00 Mohammed Zeeshan :
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > On 04/04/2016
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
> >>
> >> What do CentOS use
On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>
>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>>
>> The registration with Redhat seemed
Yes, but this is not still (very) big change as redhat partner companies
get rhel linsences for developer / internal use for free.
--
Eero
2016-04-04 16:55 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes :
> On 04/04/2016 08:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> I read that
On 04/04/2016 08:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>
>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>>
>> The registration with Redhat seemed very bu
On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me,
> and I'm not sure if I have carr
Hello Timothy,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:39:54 +0100 Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me,
> a
Yes, they are providing free version only for "developer use".
--
Eero
2016-04-04 16:39 GMT+03:00 Timothy Murphy :
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> The registration with Red
Hi,
I think you miss understood or the authors of the article about 'Redhat
offering their Linux free'. Can you please provide your source?
First of all it's the distro that has been offered for 'free', but only
for developers. Please read the original press release:
https://www.redhat.com/en/a
I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me,
and I'm not sure if I have carried it out properly.
Also, I didn't see if it was possible t
yes. yes exactly the calculation is correct. In that machine only DRBD and
HA application running.
I tell the story,
I have a telephony server with HA and DRBD mirroring(2 machines) .
Unfortunately I installed 32 bit OS on those. I come to know that after
upgrading it to 64 system will detect all
On 12/17/2012 11:19 PM, AshikAli.m wrote:
> [root@machine1 ~]# free -m
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:32183 1309 30873 0290485
> -/+ buffers/cache: 533 31649
> Swap:51199 0 51199
Thank you very much for your great explanation.
I little bit doubt that why +/- buffers/cache is not tallying for machine1.
I understood after displaying it as mb.Here is output in mb which is not
tallied.
[root@machine1 ~]# free -m
total used free sharedbuffers
On 12/17/2012 10:22 PM, AshikAli.m wrote:
> I have two 64 bit cent Os machine. I googled that in linux always show
> entire memory as used. But below showing only 1 GB detected.
no, that first one shows you have 31gb ram, about 1gb is being used by
software, and the other 30GB are in use as buff
free displays the total amount of free and used physical and swap memory in
the system. In your case "free -g" it showing you how much memory you are
using right now in gigabits.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:52 AM, AshikAli.m wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two 64 bit cent Os machine. I googled that in l
Hi,
I have two 64 bit cent Os machine. I googled that in linux always show
entire memory as used. But below showing only 1 GB detected.
*Machine 1 :*
i) It has 31 GB of ram.
[root@machine1]# free -g
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:31
on 10-24-2010 10:03 PM Ritika Garg spake the following:
> I installed CentOS5.5 on Dell Inspiron N5010. During partitioning, when I
> created swap = 6GB then additional 4MB free space was created and when I
> created ext3 for linux=217GB, then additional 7MB free space was created.
> Didn't underst
I installed CentOS5.5 on Dell Inspiron N5010. During partitioning, when I
created swap = 6GB then additional 4MB free space was created and when I
created ext3 for linux=217GB, then additional 7MB free space was created.
Didn't understand why these 2 extra free spaces were created.
On 07/14/2010 01:34 PM, Todd Denniston wrote:
>
> Did your test program actually USE the 100 megs of ram?
> Because of "lazy allocation" or "optimistic memory allocation"*** as done by
> the kernel,
"over-commit" is the term you were looking for.
> the memory
> is not actually consumed until use
Flaherty, Patrick wrote, On 07/14/2010 03:49 PM:
> I did some testing a while back, and my results showed that the -/+
> buffers line seemed to be the *Minimum* amount of ram available if the
> kernel purged it's buffers/cache. Sometimes more is available.
>
> (Roughly) The test was:
> * Turn swap
On 07/14/2010 12:49 PM, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
>
> I did some testing a while back, and my results showed that the -/+
> buffers line seemed to be the *Minimum* amount of ram available if the
> kernel purged it's buffers/cache. Sometimes more is available.
That can be the case if your kernel is
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Keith Keller
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 10:41 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] free
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:15:06AM -0400, Jason P
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:15:06AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> The man page does not say much, but does this mean I have only 396668 used by
> programs (used-cached)?
>
> Or shoul I be reading the 2nd line?
Yes, you should be reading the second line.
> [r...@ten-212 ~]# free
> tota
The man page does not say much, but does this mean I have only 396668 used by
programs (used-cached)?
Or shoul I be reading the 2nd line?
[r...@ten-212 ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 791884454788202440024 0 11168
MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Any idea about a software we can use in our local server ?
>
I've used dokuwiki for this, where I've restricted the access to the
wiki pages to registered users whom are in the appropriate user
groups. the persons sending the files upload them as wiki attachments,
u
MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a linux freeware for sharing file with a web browser
> interface - protect file by password, send link to download by email
>
> Something like the following service:
>
> https://www.yousendit.com/
>
> http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/15-great-free-online-
On 06/18/2010 08:42 AM, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a linux freeware for sharing file with a web browser
> interface - protect file by password, send link to download by email
>
> Something like the following service:
>
> https://www.yousendit.com/
>
> http://www.hongkiat.com/bl
Hi,
I'm looking a linux freeware for sharing file with a web browser
interface - protect file by password, send link to download by email
Something like the following service:
https://www.yousendit.com/
http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/15-great-free-online-file-sharing-alternati
ves/
The ide
>
> - Linux-based solution: Endian Firewall ->
> http://www.endian.com/en/solutions/technology/endianhotspot/
No hotspot functions in the free and open source version of Endian
>
> - FreeBSD-based solution: pfSense (see Captive Portal) ->
> http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&
Ah, Captive Portal it is.
Thanks a lot Sir. :)
Regards,
Roberto
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
> "Roberto HT" wrote:
> > Could anybody give me some recommended open source software for wifi
> > management?
>
>
> They're called Captive Portals:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org
"Roberto HT" wrote:
> Could anybody give me some recommended open source software for wifi
> management?
They're called Captive Portals:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captive_portal
That page lists a few of them.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923
On 05/13/2010 05:49 PM, Roberto HT wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anybody give me some recommended open source software for wifi
> management?
>
> What I am looking for is a simple and basic tools, for example the software
> will have these kind of features :
> - user connect to the wifi network
>
On 5/13/2010 11:49 AM, Roberto HT wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anybody give me some recommended open source software for wifi
> management?
>
> What I am looking for is a simple and basic tools, for example the software
> will have these kind of features :
> - user connect to the wifi network
> -
Am 13.05.2010 um 18:49 schrieb Roberto HT:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anybody give me some recommended open source software for wifi
> management?
>
you could try pfSense.
http://www.pfsense.org
They have a "captive portal" mode.
Coming with 2.0 is a function to pre-generate "vouchers".
Nothi
Dear all,
Could anybody give me some recommended open source software for wifi management?
What I am looking for is a simple and basic tools, for example the software
will have these kind of features :
- user connect to the wifi network
- user got IP from DHCP but he can't browse to anywhere at
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:47, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last summer I published a cookbook-style detailed introduction to Linux,
> based on CentOS. I recently decided to make a free online version
> available as well.
>
> Those among you reading french might be interested. Here's the link :
>
Hi,
Last summer I published a cookbook-style detailed introduction to Linux,
based on CentOS. I recently decided to make a free online version
available as well.
Those among you reading french might be interested. Here's the link :
Presentation: http://www.microlinux.fr/documentation.html#onli
>>> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
>>> system for CentOS?
>>
>> Just google for -- cheap vps centos -- and see what you find. You can
>> SCP your compressed backups into an account quite easily. We do this
>> for a mysql database backup. You could also use a cheap web hosting
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
> system for CentOS?
>
Have a look at crashplan, too. You can actually do quite a lot for
free. I also use dropbox for light-duty stuff, which also serves to
sync files between
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
>> system for CentOS?
>
> Just google for -- cheap vps centos -- and see what you find. You can
> SCP your compressed backups into an account quite easily. We do this
> for a mysql database backup.
> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
> system for CentOS?
Just google for -- cheap vps centos -- and see what you find. You can
SCP your compressed backups into an account quite easily. We do this
for a mysql database backup. You could also use a cheap web hosting
account with FT
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Take a look @ www.bqbackup.net - they offer very good remote backup
> space with SSH access.
Amazon S3? A friend uses them and it costs him very little per
month. He's been pleased so far. I have no personal experience
with them to convey. If it were m
Take a look @ www.bqbackup.net - they offer very good remote backup
space with SSH access.
On 11/2/09, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Neil Aggarwal
> wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
>> system for CentOS?
>
> I assume you mean somet
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
> system for CentOS?
I assume you mean something other than the ADrive or Rapidshare type
sites? A Google search came up with this one...
http://www.rsync.net/
...but I have no i
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>> Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to
>> collect and store
>> backups or do you want a service?
>>
>
> I want a service.
>
and what exactly do you want this 'service' to do?
___
CentOS mailing lis
> Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to
> collect and store
> backups or do you want a service?
I want a service.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU
1GB d
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> John:
>
>> tar(1)
>
> I can use that on the server, but what is the other side
> to store the files? I want the storage to be remote.
>
Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to collect and store
backups or do you want a service? For the former case,
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:21:15 -0600
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> I can use that on the server, but what is the other side
> to store the files? I want the storage to be remote.
I use rsync to do backups, which automatically works over a ssh connection.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www
John:
> tar(1)
I can use that on the server, but what is the other side
to store the files? I want the storage to be remote.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU
1GB dedicat
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
> system for CentOS?
>
tar(1)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello:
Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup
system for CentOS?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU
1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW, Zer
77 matches
Mail list logo
