Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:43:44 +0100 (CET) fabien faye wrote: > Like i have understood, xen could be also present and support on > RHEL6 and in this case, it could be supported until the cycle of RHEL > 6. But is it preferable to migrate all your xen to kvm in a near > furtur. Not going to happen.

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread fabien faye
Like i have understood, xen could be also present and support on RHEL6 and in this case, it could be supported until the cycle of RHEL 6. But is it preferable to migrate all your xen to kvm in a near furtur. Kvm is a REDHAT project and REDHAT want to put all ressources to improve and develop KV

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Eero Volotinen
On 1/20/10 7:14 PM, fabien faye wrote: > I can confirm, after my last discussion with Redhat, is it better to learn > KVM. > Xen is going to die on redhat and centos in some years. In some years? It is supported until support cycle is over. So, in RHEL 5.4 due date is: 31 Mar 2014 Anyway, the s

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Scot P. Floess
Sorry - misleading... What I mean is, my hardware does not support native virtualization. On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Neil Aggarwal wrote: >> I don't have the hardware requirements at home to support KVM > > I thought they run on the same hardware. What do you feel > would not support KVM? > >

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Neil Aggarwal
> I don't have the hardware requirements at home to support KVM I thought they run on the same hardware. What do you feel would not support KVM? Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/cpanel cPanel/WHM preinstalled on a virtual server for only $40/month! No overag

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Scot P. Floess
58:36 Objet: Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W i'm under the impression that RH is firmly in the KVM camp (at least for now), and that learning Xen on red hat/centos wouldn't be as useful as learning KVM. I agree. Since RH is moving to KVM, it is better to learn KVM

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread fabien faye
CentOS mailing list" Envoyé: Mercredi 20 Janvier 2010 16:58:36 Objet: Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W > i'm under the > impression that RH is firmly in the KVM camp (at least for now), and > that learning Xen on red hat/centos wouldn't be as useful as learn

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Neil Aggarwal
> i'm under the > impression that RH is firmly in the KVM camp (at least for now), and > that learning Xen on red hat/centos wouldn't be as useful as learning > KVM. I agree. Since RH is moving to KVM, it is better to learn KVM if you have a choice. Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957,

[CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
just to follow on my earlier post, i have pointers to a couple commercial C/W manuals for RHEL administration, but both of them use an entire chapter discussing virtualization using Xen. i'm under the impression that RH is firmly in the KVM camp (at least for now), and that learning Xen on red