On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 14:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> You said you were blocking IPs.
Yes my systems block IPs on the basis:-
Emails
--
Block if IP allocated to a data centre or to a commercial email sending
organisation.
Web
---
Hacking attempts - individual IP if a 'home-type' Intern
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> >
>> > The alternative is to be a willing victim.
>
>> It's more a question of why you run the service at all. If blocking
>> people from reaching it doesn't bother you, why not just shut it down?
>
> Blocking people ? Data Centre bots
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 12:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > If this inconvenience's an innocent web user, I have neither ability to
> > detect the inconvenience nor to determine the user's innocence. I
> > understand your hotel analog
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> If this inconvenience's an innocent web user, I have neither ability to
> detect the inconvenience nor to determine the user's innocence. I
> understand your hotel analogue. In England many hotel guests use their
> mobile phones or table
On 09/25/2014 12:26 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
No packages for EL6 AFAIK,
Seamonkey is available in EPEL.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
V,
Sorry that should be ...
I understand your hotel analogy.
P.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Valeri,
> On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
> > Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load mod_cgi
> >
> > Bash is patched (updated to new version). Automatically bloke IPs of
> > anyone trying to hack Apache. Am I safe ?
> You are. But if you run the server
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:05 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
>> file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked to bash
>
> Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:05 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
> file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked to bash
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load mod_cgi
Bash is patched (updated to new version). Automatica
On Fri, September 26, 2014 6:05 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> >On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>>Probably all Windoze
>>> >
>>> >linux apache web servers with the bash exploit
On 2014-09-26, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> >
>>> >66.186.2.172 - - [26/Sep/2014:00:49:29 -0700] "GET /cgi-bin/test.sh
>
> no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
> file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked t
On Fri, September 26, 2014 6:05 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> >On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>>Probably all Windoze
>>> >
>>> >linux apache web servers with the bash exploit
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Keith Keller <
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> On 2014-09-26, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> > On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> >>
> >> linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
> >> masse today. my (p
On 2014-09-26, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
>> masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
>> 100s of attempts like...
>>
>> 66.186.2.172 - - [26/
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
>On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>>Probably all Windoze
>
>linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
>masse today. my (patched) internet web server ha
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> Probably all Windoze
>
> linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
> masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
> 100s of attempts like...
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
66.186.2.172 - - [26/Sep/2014:00:49:29 -0700] "GET /cgi-bin/te
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 12:22 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> . just based on statistics of compromised machines...)
Probably all Windoze :-)
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
On Fri, September 26, 2014 1:27 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>>
>> No, it is not because of that. At least in my case. I started looking
>> for
>> decent open source browser that to an extent possible follows the rule
>> "don't change anything
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> No, it is not because of that. At least in my case. I started looking for
> decent open source browser that to an extent possible follows the rule
> "don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary" as far as the
> way of user inte
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> So, because you have to check a box to get the menu, you want to look
> for a new browser, which could just stop working at the whims of the
> upstream guys (like chromium did) when they move on to the latest and
> greatest glibc, etc? T
I hope, "my" government doesn't go into alliance with Russia behind my
back ;-) (I'm perfectly OK about Romania, no matter how much more
careful
I'll be about repositories hosted there compared to the ones hosted,
say,
in Finland, just based on statistics of compromised machines...)
These guy
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, September 26, 2014 11:56 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
>>> saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
On Fri, September 26, 2014 11:56 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
>> saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
>> manager being happy with a
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
>> saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
>> manager being happy with an eastern European individual's repo.
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
> saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
> manager being happy with an eastern European individual's repo.
>
You, and your boss, should
On Thu, September 25, 2014 10:27, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:09:15AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> developers to follow this:
>>
>> Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
>>
>> (it was excellent attitude to programming I was doing once: this way you
>>
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:21 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 09:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Steve Lindemann wrote:
>>> On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Johan Vermeulen
On 09/25/2014 09:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Steve Lindemann wrote:
>> On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
> From: Johan Vermeulen
>> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
>>> Yup, forgot tha
On Thu, September 25, 2014 7:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 18:16 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> >
>> > Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo
>> to my
>> > manager, who understandab
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 18:16 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my
> > manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a US gov't
> > agency (non-DoD)
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 09:09 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
Extremely wise advice. Seems upstream do not always agree :-)
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
On 25/09/14 18:18, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Jake Shipton wrote:
>>
>> Guess it's the old "if it ain't American, it ain't right"
>> attitude? :-).
>
> Don't be absurd. How 'bout "can we be sure that no one's inserted
> nasties into the code?" How 'bout "who else has looked at and
> compared the c
Sorry, missing footnotes to last email:
1] you'll notice I never mention the organization name - I really am not
allowed to speak for my organization, or my company.
2] Partly because I work for a federal contractor
mark
___
CentOS mailing lis
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:18 PM, wrote:
>>>
>> Guess it's the old "if it ain't American, it ain't right" attitude? :-).
>
> Don't be absurd. How 'bout "can we be sure that no one's inserted nasties
> into the code?" How 'bout "who else has looked at and compared the code to
> the project source?
Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 25/09/14 17:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
> I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to
> Nux and see if we can get it added to his repo.
>>>
On 25/09/14 17:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to
Nux and see if we can get it added to his repo.
>>>
>>> Maybe we can get it into e
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo
to
my manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a
US
gov't agency (non-DoD) that we work at
li.nux.ro, that's Romania not Russia.
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Tom Bishop wrote:
>>> I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to Nux and
>>> see if we can get it added to his repo.
>>
>> Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to
>> my
On 09/25/2014 04:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Yes, I still didn't find replacement for firefox... so, anyone who has a
any suggestions of decent open source browser, please, let me know.
maybe try seamonkey, I've been using it for ages (basically since
firefox split from mozilla suite ;-) )
On Thu, September 25, 2014 11:16 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
>
> On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Tom Bishop wrote:
>>> I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to Nux and
>>> see if we can get it added to his repo.
>>
>> Maybe we can get it into extras? I m
On 9/25/2014 9:07 AM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to Nux and
see if we can get it added to his repo.
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my
manager, who understandably balked at a Rus
>
> Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my
> manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a US gov't
> agency (non-DoD) that we work at
>
>mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@cento
Tom Bishop wrote:
>>>
>> I'm in the same fix... But. When I will find open source, acceptable
>> browser which I can predict will last and will have the same great
>> attitude late netscape or mozilla had, I will start installing it
>> simultaneously with firefox, yet will make it default browser,
On Thu, September 25, 2014 10:10 am, Ron Yorston wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>palemoon looks nice
>
> My concern with Pale Moon is that it's based on the Firefox 24 extended
> support release,
Sad. If there is no own developers team behind that, it hardly will
survive "enterprise level" len
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>palemoon looks nice
My concern with Pale Moon is that it's based on the Firefox 24 extended
support release, which is no longer supported. Don't know how that'll
play out.
In the meantime I've added exclude=firefox to my yum configuration and
am sticking with Firefox 24.
On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no me
>>
>
> I'm in the same fix... But. When I will find open source, acceptable
> browser which I can predict will last and will have the same great
> attitude late netscape or mozilla had, I will start installing it
> simultaneously with firefox, yet will make it default browser, which users
> can swi
On Thu, September 25, 2014 9:42 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Steve Lindemann wrote:
>> On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
> From: Johan Vermeulen
>> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
>>> Yu
Steve Lindemann wrote:
> On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen
> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
>> Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
>> It is *completel
On Thu, September 25, 2014 9:13 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
>>> From: Johan Vermeulen
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
> Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
>
Then maybe you are stuck
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exi
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:09:15AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> developers to follow this:
>
> Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
>
> (it was excellent attitude to programming I was doing once: this way you
> diminish the chance to break something that works...)
Probab
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Johan Vermeulen
>>> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
>>> Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exit that.
No. 99.44% of the time,
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
> From: Johan Vermeulen
>
>> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
>>> Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
>>>
>>> mark
>>
>> Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exit that.
>>
>> grts, Johan
>
> You can pre
From: Johan Vermeulen
> op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
>> Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
>>
>> mark
>
> Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exit that.
>
> grts, Johan
You can press the "Alt" key to show the menu.
JD
_
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
On 09/25/14 03:09, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 25-09-14 09:01, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back
up, *all*
of my tabs w
On 09/25/14 03:09, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 25-09-14 09:01, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple doze
op 25-09-14 09:01, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up,
*all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
___
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
___
CentOS
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark wrote:
> I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
> of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
>
> mark, CentOS 6.5
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all* of
my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
63 matches
Mail list logo
