Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread James Hogarth
> > I also haven't investigated yet if drbd devices can be 'grown' ... pause > replication, lvextend slave and master, xfs_grow the master, and resume > replication? or is that too easy and it won't work... > They can be grown (I used it for static image store on the Sky Entertainment websites

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread Keith Keller
On 2013-02-26, John R Pierce wrote: > > the use case is more like, if the primary backup server fails, I'd like > to have the secondary backup server running within a few hours of > futzing with the existing backups available for recovery. If you're doing something rsync-like, and if your buil

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/26/2013 4:17 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, John R Pierce wrote: > >> >the initial sync of the 8TB starting volumes is looking to be a 460 hour >> >affair. > Something wrong here. That's only 5 MB/sec; I did an initial sync of a > 10TB volume in less than a day (dual bonded g

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread Steve Thompson
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, John R Pierce wrote: > the initial sync of the 8TB starting volumes is looking to be a 460 hour > affair. Something wrong here. That's only 5 MB/sec; I did an initial sync of a 10TB volume in less than a day (dual bonded gigabits, dedicated). Steve _

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/26/2013 3:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > That should work, but what happens if they ever get out of sync? How > long will it take drbd to catch up with something that size? the initial sync of the 8TB starting volumes is looking to be a 460 hour affair. yeouch. I might have to rethink th

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:26 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > don't have anywhere near that sort of uptime requirements, but when data > starts spiralling out into the multi-terabytes with billions of file > links, rsync is painfully slow. Yes, the one problem with backuppc is that the number of hard

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/26/2013 3:03 PM, Patrick Flaherty wrote: > That being said, if you have a requirement that your backup solution > is up five nines, then yeah, use drbd / pacemaker, it's just not a use > case I see very often. don't have anywhere near that sort of uptime requirements, but when data starts sp

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread Patrick Flaherty
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6 > servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in. > > googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions... > http://www.broexperts.com/2012/0

Re: [CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6 > servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in. > > googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions... > http://www.broexperts.com/2012/0

[CentOS] drbd and el6

2013-02-26 Thread John R Pierce
hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6 servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in. googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions... http://www.broexperts.com/2012/06/how-to-install-drbd-on-centos-6-2/ is that still best pract