Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Ross Walker
On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote: >> On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes > > wrote: >> >>> I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying >>> that other enterprise distributions e

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On 2/24/11 7:37 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote: >> On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes> > wrote: >> >>> I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying >>> that other enterprise distributions exist that pr

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes > wrote: > >> I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying >> that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term >> stability without backports

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Ross Walker
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying > that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term > stability without backports ... Unbuntu LTS is a free example. They > also provide integration of all the

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/24/2011 07:12 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I went through this last week with OpenSSH version 5.x (not currently >> available for RHEL or CentOS 5 except by third party provided >> software), and bash. Turns out that OpenSSH 5.x doe

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/24/2011 07:12 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to >>> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to >> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind >> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the lat

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/24/2011 02:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know >> why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind > The "bind97" packages is in RHEL 5.6. ... and available in c5-testing, pending centos-5.6 release; so if you

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-24 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > > Let's face it most auditors these days are just accountants with Infosys Mgmt > text books. Or former sysadmins who didn't make it in the "management track" but still wanted to be able to lord it over others...

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Ross Walker
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to >> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind >> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the la

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread John R Pierce
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote: > > Hi. > > I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to > know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind > “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many > security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I un

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Machin, Greg
mailing list Cc: Subject: Re: [CentOS] current bind version On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:08 PM, "Machin, Greg" wrote: Hi. I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind “bind-chroot-

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Ross Walker
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:08 PM, "Machin, Greg" wrote: > Hi. > > I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why > CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind > “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many > security fixes is on

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Steve Walsh
On 02/24/2011 01:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote: Hi. I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind "bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3" when the latest release that has many security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I understa

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:08 +1300, Machin, Greg wrote: > I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to > know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind > “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many > security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I

Re: [CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote: > Hi. > > I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know > why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind > “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many > security fixes is on 9.7.

[CentOS] current bind version

2011-02-23 Thread Machin, Greg
Hi. I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind "bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3" when the latest release that has many security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I understand that its to maintain a known stable platform by