> ill bet you would take in a boatload of money re: donations to censor and/or
> kick "a.l. paul" off the lists
Yes, maybe it is time that this person is moderated away?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
> what a crock -- go cry elsewhere, troll
>
> I suppose I'll have to take up mailing list moderation issues
> again -- The person I needed to talk with is already away for
> the weekend, however. Fortunately we have already covered
> the topic of addressing your spam and have consensus as to
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 20:47 +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> It might be better to file the bug report against the website for the
> missing documentation that to harp on the design :)
It was essentially a suggestion the Centos Management Board appeal for
fresh volunteers to revise the web sit
On 9/17/11, Always Learning wrote:
> and it is not black
>
> color: #464646;
While the exact optimal shade is arguable (a tad too light IMO), past
ergonomics studies indicate that extreme contrast such as #00 on
#ff is more tiring to read so can't really fault the devs on this
one.
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 00:47 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in
> > preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger
> > font size will be useful for most people
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 00:36 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> I understand from off list correspondence with you, 'Always',
> that you consider it relaxation and sport to troll here and
> 'stir the pot'.
I am unaware of ever making those comments !
Paul.
__
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 00:29 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 09/16/11 8:29 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in
> > preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger
> > font size will be useful for most people ov
On 09/16/11 8:29 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in
> preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger
> font size will be useful for most people over 40 years of age.
about 700 years ago, give or take a century,
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> Can't see any new web site on the latter URL. I'm not a Flash user by
> choice.
> Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in
> preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger
> font size will be useful
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
>> However, you can file a bug report against the website.
>
> What is the point in 'complaining' by filing a BUG report when it is
> conspicuously evident the existing web person(s) can not cope because
> they have insufficient time or have died or have
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 04:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> There is an ongoing Website V2 sub-project that has been running for
> some time:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/
Can't see any new web site on the latter URL. I'm not a Flash user by
choic
On 09/17/2011 03:44 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> As I said above, this isn't something people can volunteer for - only
>> a very select few have the appropriate privileges to perform the task.
>> There are trust issues.
>>
>> However, you
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> As I said above, this isn't something people can volunteer for - only
> a very select few have the appropriate privileges to perform the task.
> There are trust issues.
>
> However, you can file a bug report against the website.
What is the
On 09/17/2011 03:23 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 02:54 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
>>>
The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications
>
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 02:54 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
> >
> >> The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications
> >> for all centos releases except for centos6. Is
On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
>
>> The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications
>> for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or
>> did the site maintainers just forget abou
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
> The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications
> for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or
> did the site maintainers just forget about it.
The Centos web site needs updating. Perhaps wil
The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications for
all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or did the
site maintainers just forget about it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
