Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 2016-11-08 08:27, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes > helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have > been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland > from 6.3 to 6.8 but only sele

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/8/2016 9:28 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > >> Unfortunately, that's the constraint it seems hence, there's inquiry of >> other options. But, looks like, any el6 package should work as long as we >> meet the dependencies? >> > > mixing curre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/8/2016 9:28 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Unfortunately, that's the constraint it seems hence, there's inquiry of other options. But, looks like, any el6 package should work as long as we meet the dependencies? mixing current 6.8 packages with very old 6.3 packages and libraries is a recipe fo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Unfortunately, that's the constraint it seems hence, there's inquiry of other options. But, looks like, any el6 package should work as long as we meet the dependencies? Kindly thanks for many help. On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:55 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/8/2016 6:27 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/8/2016 6:27 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland from 6.3 to 6.8 but only selected

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 08:27 -0600, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > . So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have > been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland > from 6.3 to 6.8 but only selected few packages. The picture seems to be > that their company runs a lot of apps

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/08/2016 06:27 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions. Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

> > > > Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture > that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions. > Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Am 08.11.2016 um 07:14 schrieb Dipal Bhatt : > Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is > probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it > would break all kinds of things. Let me rephrase it, to be clear. Its NOT fine to update selecte

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 00:14 -0600, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is > probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it > would break all kinds of things. Please be realistic and professional. You simply can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/07/2016 08:53 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Understood, but unfortunately, updating to latest version of CentOs 6 is not the option in this specific situation If you require support at a point release, you should consult Red Hat: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/238533 _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it would break all kinds of things. Something of such nature of request would need to be internally tested by simply updating the selected packages, te

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/7/2016 9:43 PM, Frank Cox wrote: Upgrading "selected packages only" will leave you with something that's neither fish or fowl, and it won't meet your requirements as stated either. more specifically, it will be a completely untested configuration. considering that any single package

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Yes you would break all kinds of things. In a nutshell folks are saying you are free to try but when it blows up...you better have a total backup to restore the entire box. Your first priority should be getting whatever is holding you back from proper system updates and security out of the way.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

The specs may have certain dependency on subset of 6.3 packages, but not for all other packages/binaries, as I mentioned earlier. So, to keep things rather intact, we would simply meet requirements by only updating "selected packages only". And, for now, that should be considered intermittent sol

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

What constraint is requiring you to run a highly vulnerable server? On Nov 8, 2016 00:34, "Dipal Bhatt" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: > > > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > > > >> Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to b

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:33:56 -0600 Dipal Bhatt wrote: > But, yes, there's > no way to update the 6.3 to 6.8 as I repeatedly mentioned which is the only > requirement/constraint. It occurs to me to ask what you consider to be version 6.3. If you update any of the rpms to the 6.8 version you are n

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > >> Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be >> able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. >> > > any such external specifications that insist you run an old obsolete > operating

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. any such external specifications that insist you run an old obsolete operating system are inherently broken. I hope this server isn't connected t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Thanks Frank and all. Understood, but unfortunately, updating to latest version of CentOs 6 is not the option in this specific situation, in stead, we are taking a look into options of updating only hand picked packages on Centos 6.3 to latest. Any other guidance is welcome and appreciated. On

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:33:22 -0600 Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Simply updating these packages on 6.3, would there be any issues w/o > updating rest of the packages from 6.3 to 6.8? I suppose you could try it and see what happens. That comes with a two-part warranty: If it breaks, you own both pieces.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Hi, Thanks for your responses. Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. But, it would be nice to be able to update specific packages to latest that's available in 6.8 repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/ Fo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/7/2016 6:03 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: The other option is to use CentOS 6.8 updated package on 6.3, but I am not sure of any upstream and downstream dependencies in 6.3 without updating the rest of the userland from 6.3 to 6.8. Nonetheless, would this option be feasible? yum update wil

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Nov 7, 2016, at 9:03 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Hi, > IT seems, centos6.3 does no longer get any updates esp security fixes as > per readme here: > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.3/readme > I believe there’s some confusion about how CentOS release

[CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Hi, IT seems, centos6.3 does no longer get any updates esp security fixes as per readme here: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.3/readme Is there updated source RPMs that can be rebuilt and hand patched, for example, nss-util 3.21.0-2 or openssl 1.0.1e that can be safely used on CentOS 6.3? Any ot

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

> > As has been pointed out several times here, you should NOT assume you > can just install individual fixes such as the latest openssl for the > heartbeat fixes, and so forth, as these have only been tested running > with ALL the latest packages, not every conceivable combination of > component v

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

On 12/1/2014 11:29 PM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? As the others said, the OS is "CentOS 6"..

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/14 08:29, Hadi Motamedi wrote: > Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues > warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. > Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can > be

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

On 02/12/14 02:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? Thank you The heartbleed and shells

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

On 12/02/2014 10:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? It is generally unsafe to run a

[CentOS] centos 6.3

Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Thanks to especially Mark Sir. After *yum -y update* system is now enjoying GUI !! One thing to mention is that my system processing also increases considerably !! Thanks again to All !! -- *Cheers, Mayur*. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

You should not have removed the i686 packages. The packaging system ensures that there are no conflicts. I suggest that you reinstall them. It may be that there is no need of them, but second-guessing the packaging system is never a good idea, unless you know *exactly* what you are doing. Cheers,

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 23.04.2013 16:49, schrieb Mayur Patil: > Hello, > > I have done following steps: [...] > I have google for this but not find confirm solution. > > Am I missing something; please help ?? > > Seeking for guidance, It is virtually impossible to ded

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, I have done following steps: Press Ctrl+Alt+F2 By root login, I entered following command : yum groupinstall basic-desktop desktop-platform x11 fonts Then I reboot system; only blank screen appears ; not even cursor. Then I tried this : yum groupinstall -y ' X Win

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, My X windows system is not working So, Mark sir has recommended following steps that what I understand: 1 Press ctrl+alt+f2 2. Then run these commands yum groupinstall basic-desktop desktop-platform >> install installs video drivers; if you add a desktop instal

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello Mark Sir, Sorry if you feel bad due to my foolishness and inadequate knowledge. My actual problem is that my setup is at college and due to internet connectivity problems as well as college hours are over, I am responding from home. So as per your instructions I will again go

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Mayur Patil wrote: One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible >>> for GUI of the centos. >> You should have command line login using >> >> >> > Problem is Appearance of login window. System boots normally; now I >> > will try out your said command. >> >> gnome or

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello Sir, sorry for late reply. >>> One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible > >> for GUI of the centos. > >> > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer > >> screen back in action > >> > >> There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing.

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Mayur Patil wrote: > >> > One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible >> for GUI of the centos. >> > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer >> screen back in action >> >> There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing. You should have comman

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello Sir, > > One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for > > GUI of the centos. > > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer > screen back in action > > There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing. You should have command > line log

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Mayur Patil wrote: > Hello, > > One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for > GUI of the centos. > > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer > screen back in action There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing. You should have command

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action that will be a great help to me. And I also want to ask that is it possible to install that files from

[CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, I have trapped in weird problem. My Setup is CentOS 6.3 Desktop edition x86_64 arch. My login screen is blinking so frequently that I am unable to see and login into it. And also I am unable to reinstall the OS because it will take very long time re-setup everything as per my configura

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application

If it helps, I figured out the application causing the error message. It's Ksplice's uptrace-upgrade which runs via cron... Still not sure what the solution is, or if this error is benign. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, P J wrote: > Ahh, premature send! My apologies. > > Seemingly random ti

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application

Ahh, premature send! My apologies. Seemingly random times every day the following appears in /var/log/messages gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application --snip-- Anyone have any insigh

[CentOS] CentOS 6.3 gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application

Howdy, Seemingly randomly every day the following appears in /var/log/messages gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application ___ CentOS mailing l

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:38 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > 2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield Big snip... > > You are, none the less, not suppose to use addresses in that block for > > ANYTHING. The fc00::/7 block is intended for what you want to do. Even > > if they happen to work, they are not guarante

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:28 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > > 2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I may be totally off base here but... > > > > > > On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > > > > hello, > > > >i met a problem in conf

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:28 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > 2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield > > > Hello, > > > > I may be totally off base here but... > > > > On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > > > hello, > > >i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box > > > i install cen

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield > Hello, > > I may be totally off base here but... > > On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > > hello, > >i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box > > i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. > > i use a strai

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

Slight Clarification on v6 addressing... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 15:38 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > Those may be routed between your machines but may not be routed on the > global net either as a source or destination address. Your machines > should also be given "link local" addresses whic

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

Hello, I may be totally off base here but... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > hello, >i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box > i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. > i use a straight-through cable to connect centosv0:netcard-2

[CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. i use a straight-through cable to connect centosv0:netcard-2 and centosv1:netcard2 the topology is this: client c(windows xp) <-->centosv0:netcard-3 <--> centosv0:netc

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

After you have tried the pcie_aspm boot option, also try : echo performance > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy This will disable ASPM on PCIe and operate with maximum performance. This is what I use today on the DL380 G7. On 25.3.2013, at 09:06, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) wr

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

Hello Svavar This was the first time that this problem occurred - with 60 Servers and about half a year of Centos 6 (5 before). But because the interfaces have a permanent load - really 24x7 - problems with power management would be a disaster. I will try to switch off. Thanks Hartmut > How of

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

How often are you getting these crashes ? I had simular problem on my HP DL380 G7 server. I disabled Active State PowerManagement on the PCI-E express. Try it. Add pcie_aspm=off as optional boot option. Best regards, Svavar O Reykjavik - Iceland On 19.3.2013, at 15:32, Woehrle Hartmut SBB

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

What's the irq number you can find for the device? You may have to find the driver development guide to figure out what the debug message says. Just the first line points out there is no irq for the device. You can check it in /proc/interrupts, then find a match in /proc/irq/ Banya

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

> On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) > wrote: > > > Hello Mailing List > > > > I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. > > The kernel log says: > > If that's a DL360 G7 server, make sure you've applied all of the latest > firmware patches from

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) wrote: > Hello Mailing List > > I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. > The kernel log says: If that's a DL360 G7 server, make sure you've applied all of the latest firmware patches from HP on it. The G7

[CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

Hello Mailing List I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. The kernel log says: --- /var/log/messages - Mar 19 15:45:06 server kernel: do_IRQ: 2.168 No irq handler for vector (irq -

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:45 PM, David Hrbáč wrote: > Dne 12.3.2013 19:03, Fabien Archambault napsal(a): > > I too have the same problem but couldn't figure where is the issue. It > > stops working even if the service says all is right. I have to restart > > the service to let it work again... >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Theo Band wrote: > On 03/12/2013 05:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > I'm running fail2ban on my server (under CentOS-6.4) > > and it seems to be running according to > > - > > [tim@grover fail2ban]$ sudo service fail2ban status > > Fail2ban

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

Dne 12.3.2013 19:03, Fabien Archambault napsal(a): > I too have the same problem but couldn't figure where is the issue. It > stops working even if the service says all is right. I have to restart > the service to let it work again... > > I will try to find through your idea. > > Thanks, > Fabien >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

2013/3/12 Theo Band : > On 03/12/2013 05:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I'm running fail2ban on my server (under CentOS-6.4) >> and it seems to be running according to >> - >> [tim@grover fail2ban]$ sudo service fail2ban status >> Fail2ban (pid 31794) is running... >> Statu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On 03/12/2013 05:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm running fail2ban on my server (under CentOS-6.4) > and it seems to be running according to > - > [tim@grover fail2ban]$ sudo service fail2ban status > Fail2ban (pid 31794) is running... > Status > |- Number of jail: 1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

Theo Band wrote: > I have updated recently to 6 and see that fail2band ssh dos no longer > works. Indeed after log rotate fail2ban seems to follow the old log file > instead of the newly created /var/log/secure. > I had backend = auto in /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf and gamin and pyinotify > are both i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Theo Band wrote: > On 10/17/2012 05:51 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > > I recall others on this list are using fail2ban to block brute force > > login attempts. > > Packages are from the EPEL repo, so I'm just sharing some knowledge here. > > > > For about two months

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On 10/17/2012 05:51 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > I recall others on this list are using fail2ban to block brute force > login attempts. > Packages are from the EPEL repo, so I'm just sharing some knowledge here. > > For about two months now I've had a CentOS 6.3 box (web host) in > production that occ

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 early panic on Xeon E3-1270V2 - CentOS 6.4 too

Having read that RHEL/CentOS 6.4 came with new VMware drivers I checked whether this problem might perchance be fixed. It isn't. In the meantime I got a report that Windows 8 (64 bit) showed a similar problem. So, updated problem matrix (ESXi build omitted as it has no influence): Processor

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On 03/06/2013 04:18 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz >>> wrote: On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz >> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: >>> On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed Centos 6

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: >> On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >>> I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed >>> Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. >>> >>> The internal video does

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed >> Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. >> >> The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine), >> though a monitor

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed > Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. > > The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine), > though a monitor attacked to the VGA port works fine. Although m

[CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine), though a monitor attacked to the VGA port works fine. Although my intension is to use this as a portable test server, it would b

[CentOS] Centos 6.3 and dovecot with an abrt problem

Everyone, I have a mail server running CentOS release 6.3 (Final) with 2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.i686 kernel that is reporting errors to me pertaining dovecot. I have appended the error message to this note. There is only one user that appears to generate this message, and it is generated to me by way

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

On 02/01/2013 05:41 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: > 2013/2/1 odusseas : >> Luigi Rosa writes: >> >>> >>> Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: >>> In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 01/02/2013 11:29: > I am working this issue right now, should be fixed in about an hour. It is, thanks. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Mathematicians do it in theory. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ve

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Using any single 3rd party repo is likely to work at least until the >> next update because the contents will have been tested against the >> base distro - as long as the packages are intended for use with >> RHEL/Cen

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

Les Mikesell wrote: > Using any single 3rd party repo is likely to work at least until the > next update because the contents will have been tested against the > base distro - as long as the packages are intended for use with > RHEL/Centos. I have a slightly different question. I had kbsingh-Cent

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

2013/2/1 odusseas : > Luigi Rosa writes: > >> >> >> Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: >> >> > In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update >> > gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) >> >> Confirmed. Same issue here. >> >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

Luigi Rosa writes: > > > Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: > > > In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update > > gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) > > Confirmed. Same issue here. > > Ciao, > luigi > The sam

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

On 02/01/2013 01:33 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. >> >> But yum update gives me: >> >> Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) >> Requires: libre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: > In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update > gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Confirmed. Same issue here. Ciao, luigi - -- /

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > Hello, > > In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. > > But yum update gives me: > > Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) > Requires: libreport >= 2.0.9-5.el6_3.2 > Removing: libr

[CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

Hello, In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Requires: libreport >= 2.0.9-5.el6_3.2 Removing: libreport-2.0.9-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) libreport = 2.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Bry8 Star wrote: > When using multiple repo, then how would i know, an > app/lib from non-CentOS (that is, 3rd party repo) is going > to conflict or not with CentOS core, base, essential > app/lib packages ? > I don't think there is any way to know that. And mor

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 24.01.2013 23:26, Nux! wrote: > If you'd like to try, I do maintain a desktop related repository meant > to not conflict with @Base or EPEL (or Elrepo): You are backporting pkgs from fedora to el6. Imho you should supply your manpower to epel, because epel provides backported pkgs! -- Ibrahim

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

When using multiple repo, then how would i know, an app/lib from non-CentOS (that is, 3rd party repo) is going to conflict or not with CentOS core, base, essential app/lib packages ? We need to know CentOS core, base, essential components. According to this file: /usr/lib/anaconda/installclasses

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

* Another way to use multiple repo, other than what i mentioned in previous email (different repo with different priority# ), is to: * Set all repo's base, main/default, stable, extra, etc sections/channels on priority 10, and set all repo's other channels/sections like "testing", (source, debuginf

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

Hi thanks. I had a typo on my previsous emai it was: chmod -R g+rws objects > -r--r--r--. 1 myuser mygroup 156 Jan 29 22:22 > objects/fa/905054c795a3b7e5c244bfc6f3a30a0277c6d0 min On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 01/30/2013 03:34 AM, Min Wang wrote: > > > HI > > >

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

On 01/30/2013 03:34 AM, Min Wang wrote: > HI > > I have a git bare repo on centos 6.3 ( with selinux off) > > the config is: > [core] > repositoryformatversion = 0 > filemode = true > bare = true > sharedRepository = all ( or true or group) > > > chmod -R g+rs objects > >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

Sorry, mentioned [pgdg92] twice. Pls ignore/delete the [pgdg92] that has priority 15. Received from Bry8 Star, on 2013-01-28 10:16 AM: > For PostgreSQL, i've done these (shown below) at initial/test > stage: (pls DO NOT follow/copy it, try to understand pattern and > do what fits for your case/n

[CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

HI I have a git bare repo on centos 6.3 ( with selinux off) the config is: [core] repositoryformatversion = 0 filemode = true bare = true sharedRepository = all ( or true or group) chmod -R g+rs objects when git pushed the changes from remote ssh . the new file under obj

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

I've tried this command: yum deplist gnutls --disableplugin=filter-data,priorities --disableexcludes=all --enablerepo=\* > yum_01.txt ... that yum_01.txt file was around 202KB in my case. Result is formatted like this: ##<...snip...> package: gnutls.i686 2.12.22-1.fc18 dependency: libz.s

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/28/2013 01:26 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Taking gtk2 as in our example here, if you wanted a new gtk2 in >> CentOS-5.9, then you would have to rebuild the following packages: > A quick (?) question: > > What is the best way to view dependencies

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Taking gtk2 as in our example here, if you wanted a new gtk2 in > CentOS-5.9, then you would have to rebuild the following packages: A quick (?) question: What is the best way to view dependencies? 1. We can use yum deplist to view dependencies of a

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bry8 Star wrote: > > If ALL new apps/libs starts to change their API without backward > compatibility, then, definitely updating/upgrading core/base apps > would cause domino effect, like you have pointed out. Various apps > and libs are inter-dependent & inter-con

  1   2   3   >