On 12/30/2010 04:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/30 Steve Clark :
>> On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
>>
>> On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
>>
>>
>> On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>
>>
>> - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on
2010/12/30 Steve Clark :
> On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> 2010/12/30 Steve Clark :
>
>
> On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>
> 2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
>
>
> On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
>
> - fast enough to do o
On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/30 Steve Clark:
On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/29 John R Pierce:
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50m
On 12/30/2010 07:34 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/30 Steve Clark:
On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/29 John R Pierce:
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50m
2010/12/30 Steve Clark :
> On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>
> 2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
>
>
> On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
>
> - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
> to 100mb
>
>
> THAT is a tough
On 12/29/2010 01:23 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/29 John R Pierce:
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
to 100mb
THAT is a tough requirement.
I was go
On 12/29/2010 01:03 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:23:43PM -0800, Nataraj wrote:
>> Then the Mac mini might be what I need performancewise.
> The Mini has only one wired interface, and its 802.11 interface may or
> may not have a fully working driver in the CentOS 6 kernel. S
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:23:43PM -0800, Nataraj wrote:
>
> Then the Mac mini might be what I need performancewise.
The Mini has only one wired interface, and its 802.11 interface may or
may not have a fully working driver in the CentOS 6 kernel. So if you
really need two ethernet interfaces yo
> That would be useful. I'm pretty sure openvpn uses the OPENSSL
> libraries, so it might very well improve openvpn performance. That
> would be a big win. I think the Dell dual xeon for $650 is the easiest
> solution. It is Redhat certified and requires no 3rd party device
> drivers for CentOS
On 12/28/2010 11:01 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> take a look at: http://www.mini-itx.com/store/ and
>> http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=40
> http://ocf-linux.sourceforge.net/ possibly also helps on smp systems
> (dualcore) with openvpn aes encryption
>
> --
> Eero
>
On 12/28/2010 10:32 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/29 Nataraj :
>> On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> 2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
> to 100mb
THAT is a tou
> take a look at: http://www.mini-itx.com/store/ and
> http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=40
http://ocf-linux.sourceforge.net/ possibly also helps on smp systems
(dualcore) with openvpn aes encryption
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
2010/12/29 Nataraj :
> On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> 2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
>>> On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
- fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
to 100mb
>>> THAT is a tough requirement.
>>>
>>>
>>> I was going to recommend t
On 12/28/2010 09:04 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
>> On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>> - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
>>> to 100mb
>> THAT is a tough requirement.
>>
>>
>> I was going to recommend the Alix boards. they run pfSen
2010/12/29 John R Pierce :
> On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>
>> - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
>> to 100mb
>
> THAT is a tough requirement.
>
>
> I was going to recommend the Alix boards. they run pfSense really
> nicely, and should be able to run a st
On 12/28/10 1:55 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> - fast enough to do openvpn encryption on WAN links ranging from 50mb
> to 100mb
THAT is a tough requirement.
I was going to recommend the Alix boards. they run pfSense really
nicely, and should be able to run a stripped down centos install OK.
with
Hi Nataraj,
Take a look at the Intel Atom platform. The D510MO & D945GCLF2D run
beautifully under CentOS and I've used both as firewalls in the past.
Another linux based firewall system I use has users reporting the two
boards above supporting AV, Content Filtering (proxy), etc on 50Mbps
FIOS conn
I'm looking for some kind of appliance like box, maybe something like
this:http://www.soekris.com/net5501.htm on which I could deploy iptables
based firewall/openvpn/DNS and other local network services in a wide
area network. I would probably install on a flash device. I would
prefer something t
18 matches
Mail list logo