Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-14 Thread Ritika Garg
Was wondering why that occurred. Earlier I had installed adobe flash but still videos didn't play. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Brian Mathis
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: > On 12/13/2010 12:05 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote: >> 2010/12/13 Pintér Tibor: >>> On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote: I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of firefox, the videos are playing on the inter

Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Franz
On 12/13/2010 12:05 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote: > 2010/12/13 Pintér Tibor: >> On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote: >>> I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of >>> firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message >>> "flash player download require

Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Sven Aluoor
2010/12/13 Pintér Tibor : > On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote: >> I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of >> firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message >> "flash player download required" used to come. > > so what? is that a problem?

Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Pintér Tibor
On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote: > I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of > firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message > "flash player download required" used to come. so what? is that a problem? you want your message back? t __

[CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Ritika Garg
I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message "flash player download required" used to come. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Mike A. Harris
Zube wrote: > On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: > >> I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 >> install. > > 32-bit or 64-bit? > > The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit > local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Mike A. Harris
Chuck wrote: > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. From a stock CentOS 5 system, fully updated do the following: 1) Install Adobe's yum repository configuration: rpm -ivh http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/adobe-release/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.no

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 15:02 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On 3/29/09, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote: > >> I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent > >> 5.2 install. > > >> An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin r

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 3/29/09, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote: >> I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent >> 5.2 install. >> An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin return with no >> complaints. >> > I notice you said in another post

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote: > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent > 5.2 install. > > From rpm install: > Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink > in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located > i

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500 > Chuck wrote: > > > Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info > out > > like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the > > only 2 curl packages that ship

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500 Chuck wrote: > Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info out > like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the > only 2 curl packages that ship with centos 5.2. You're absolutely sure about that ftp://f

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500 > Chuck wrote: > > > Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and > > storage virt.) > > > > billabong:~ ==> rpm -q -a | grep -i curl > > curl-7.15.5-2.el5 > > curl-devel-7.15.5-2.

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500 Chuck wrote: > Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and > storage virt.) > > billabong:~ ==> rpm -q -a | grep -i curl > curl-7.15.5-2.el5 > curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5 curl.i386 -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.me

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 3/29/09, Chuck wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >>> 2009/3/29 Chuck : >>> > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent >>> > 5.2 >>> > install. >> Yes adobe flash player is the one I

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500 > Chuck wrote: > > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > > install. > > Do you have curl.i386 installed? (I've been bitten by this before.) > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ M

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus > wrote: > >> 2009/3/29 Chuck : >> > >> > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 >> > install. >> >> Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit a

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500 Chuck wrote: > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. Do you have curl.i386 installed? (I've been bitten by this before.) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > 2009/3/29 Chuck : > > > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > > install. > > Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit and > have Shockwave Flash installed and working with Firefox

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/29 Chuck : > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube wrote: >> On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: >> > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 >> > install. >> 32-bit or 64-bit? >> The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit >> lo

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/29 Chuck : > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit and have Shockwave Flash installed and working with Firefox v.3.0.6. Does that work for you? When I test at this URL:

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube wrote: > On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: > > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > > install. > > 32-bit or 64-bit? > > The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit > local version of Fire

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Zube
On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. 32-bit or 64-bit? The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway). On my 64-bit 5.2 m

[CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 install. >From rpm install: Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located in /usr/lib/flash-plugins nada. SoI then copied the plugin direct