Re: [CentOS] Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud

>> On Feb 27, 2020, at 13:40, John Pierce wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:40 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming < >> teo.en.ming.feb9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Subject: Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web >> Hosting

Re: [CentOS] Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:40 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming < teo.en.ming.feb9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Subject: Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web > Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud.. > please stop spamming this list with cPanel crap. --

[CentOS] Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud

Subject: Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, Singapore Date: 27 Feb 2020 Thursday Rationale for Re-configuration of BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel

[CentOS] Mr. Teo En Ming's Guide to Deploying CentOS Web Panel (CWP) Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud

Redundant Links to Teo En Ming's Guide to Deploying CentOS Web Panel (CWP) Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/23/71 [2] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2002.2/08712.html [3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=158246414013004&w

Re: [CentOS] Web site not responding with Firefox 52.6.0 (64-bit)

On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 02:04:07AM +, Richard wrote: > > > > 503 - Service Offline > Slashdot is presently in offline mode. Only the front page > and story pages linked from the front page are available in > this mode. Please try again later. > > whether using Chrome or FF 52.6.0 or

Re: [CentOS] Web site not responding with Firefox 52.6.0 (64-bit)

> Date: Saturday, March 03, 2018 20:54:56 -0500 > From: Fred Smith > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:55:04PM -0600, dsav...@peaknet.net wrote: >> I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the >> distant web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with >> the latest Fire

Re: [CentOS] Web site not responding with Firefox 52.6.0 (64-bit)

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:55:04PM -0600, dsav...@peaknet.net wrote: > I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the distant > web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with the latest > Firefox on my Windows 10 desktop PC, but not with Firefox 52.6.0 on this > CentOS

[CentOS] Web site not responding with Firefox 52.6.0 (64-bit)

I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the distant web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with the latest Firefox on my Windows 10 desktop PC, but not with Firefox 52.6.0 on this CentOS 7.4 laptop. This has been an on-going problem for several weeks. Google sea

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

Le 07/07/2017 à 12:53, Pete Biggs a écrit : > There's lots of pages out there about hardening Apache and what file > ownership and permissions the site should have. Everyone has their > opinion and the defaults for different distros varies. But the > underlying idea is that the web server files sho

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

On Friday, July 7, 2017 6:45:48 AM CDT Pete Biggs wrote: > > File permissions are 574. Note that owners are NOT required to have > > higher > > permissions than groups! > > > > find /var/www/html -type f -exec chmod 574 {} \; > > Normal files really shouldn't have their execute bit set. There is

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 12:56 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > Not necessarily. In order to change permissions on a file you need to > > have write access to the directory (i.e. the special file in the parent > > directory that describes the files present in t

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Pete Biggs wrote: Not necessarily. In order to change permissions on a file you need to have write access to the directory (i.e. the special file in the parent directory that describes the files present in the directory). To delete, yes, but to chmod? It makes no sense for

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

> > File permissions are 574. Note that owners are NOT required to have higher > permissions than groups! > > find /var/www/html -type f -exec chmod 574 {} \; Normal files really shouldn't have their execute bit set. There is no need to (since they aren't going to be executed) and just sets u

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 12:31 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Bill Gee wrote: > > > File permissions are 574. Note that owners are NOT required to have higher > > permissions than groups! > > But the owner can change the permissions, no? Not necessarily. In order to change permis

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Bill Gee wrote: File permissions are 574. Note that owners are NOT required to have higher permissions than groups! But the owner can change the permissions, no? 574 is a properly perculiar permission to set. jh ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

On Friday, July 7, 2017 5:25:29 AM CDT Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have a series of websites hosted on two CentOS 7 servers, using Apache > virtual hosts. One of these servers is a "sandbox" machine, to test > things and to fiddle around. > > Since Apache is running as system user 'apache

Re: [CentOS] Web server files ownership?

> > Since Apache is running as system user 'apache' and system group > 'apache', I thought it sensible that hosted files be owned by that process. > > # ls -l /var/www/html/ > total 24 > drwxr-x---. 3 apache apache 4096 6 juil. 09:37 default > drwxr-x---. 3 apache apache 4096 6 juil. 10:01 php

[CentOS] Web server files ownership?

Hi, I have a series of websites hosted on two CentOS 7 servers, using Apache virtual hosts. One of these servers is a "sandbox" machine, to test things and to fiddle around. On the sandbox server, I have a few dummy websites I'm hosting. # ls /var/www/html/ default phpinfo slackbox-mail slack

[CentOS] web content process and sloooww firefox

Today, for the first time, I noticed a process named "Web Content". I was running top because firefox was once again not allowing me to scroll. Having been down this road before, I would normally have just closed and reopened firefox. I needed to do it fairly often. Web Content was new. Eventually

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

On 04/12/2013 05:14 PM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: [snip] > Can anyone suggest a good setup for e-mails erving, calendaring, web mail? > Web mail is particularly important for my wife so she can check e-mail when > she is at work. Try Zarafa plus Z-Push for phone sync. The web mail app is very ni

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason T. Slack-Moehrle Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 7:46 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] web collaboration packages. Hello All, Try as I might, I cannot get Zimbra 8.0.3 to

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

Thanks for the notes John, let me go through this process again. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Jason T. Slack-Moehrle > > I can get through the install but Zimbra wont start. It says it started, > > but didn't I get LDAP errors, Sasl errors, AV and antispam. I work

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

From: Jason T. Slack-Moehrle > I can get through the install but Zimbra wont start. It says it started, > but didn't I get LDAP errors, Sasl errors, AV and antispam. I worked though > them a lot yesterday but I still can not get the mta started and nothing > starts listening on 443 either. I have

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

Hi John, I can get through the install but Zimbra wont start. It says it started, but didn't I get LDAP errors, Sasl errors, AV and antispam. I worked though them a lot yesterday but I still can not get the mta started and nothing starts listening on 443 either. I have Apache not listening to 443,

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

From: Jason T. Slack-Moehrle > Try as I might, I cannot get Zimbra 8.0.3 to install on CentOS 6.4, even > with --platform override. I followed some tutorials even that show the > result working and nada. What do you mean by "cannot get to install"...? Up to where does the install process go? Any

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

Zarafa? I think comes with epel and works better with Android than Zimbra. verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid. Александр Кириллов schreef: >>> Web mail is particularly important for my wife so she can check >>> e-mail when >>> she is at work. > >roundcubemail? > >

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

>> Web mail is particularly important for my wife so she can check >> e-mail when >> she is at work. roundcubemail? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] web collaboration packages.

Wow, a better search yields a fair amount of packages. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle < slackmoeh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > Try as I might, I cannot get Zimbra 8.0.3 to install on CentOS 6.4, even > with --platform override. I followed some tutorials even th

[CentOS] web collaboration packages.

Hello All, Try as I might, I cannot get Zimbra 8.0.3 to install on CentOS 6.4, even with --platform override. I followed some tutorials even that show the result working and nada. Can anyone suggest a good setup for e-mails erving, calendaring, web mail? Web mail is particularly important for my

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 19:02 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 24.12.2012 00:03, schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu: > > I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. The > > newest release sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than Squirrelmail. > > Interesting. Last time I looked

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: >On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Tilman Schmidt > wrote: >> Am 24.12.2012 00:03, schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu: >>> I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. The >>> newest release sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than Squirr

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 24.12.2012 00:03, schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu: >> I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. The >> newest release sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than Squirrelmail. > > Interesting. Last time I looked, Ro

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 24.12.2012 18:02, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 24.12.2012 00:03, schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu: >> I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. >> The >> newest release sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than >> Squirrelmail. > > Interesting. Last time I looked, Roundcub

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

Am 24.12.2012 00:03, schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu: > I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. The > newest release sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than Squirrelmail. Interesting. Last time I looked, Roundcube had issues with big (>1GB) mailboxes. How does it fare

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 23:51 -0500, Digimer wrote: > I used it for many years, but switched to RoundCube as SM seems to not > be growing much anymore. Been happy with RC so far. I second the RC recommendation! I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. The newest release

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

Everyone, Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. Greg Ennis Hey, Thanks to everyone for your responses. You have given me a great l

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:50 AM, SilverTip257 wrote: > > Comcast's customer mail system runs on Zimbra. I've used it some when > helping out family members and I'm not overly impressed by it. I just > think the Zimbra webmail GUI is a bit clunky and slow ... but then again > that could be relate

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, wrote: > >> We are currently still using SquirrelMail. I hate the GUI > >> (aesthetically), but it works well and there are plugins for about > >> everything one would ask. If only someone could create a nice > >> contemporary GUI (HTML 5) for it! > > My hosting p

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 12/18/2012 11:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. I am getting set up for a major mail rebuild moving from F12/Postfix/Mysql/CourierMail/Squirrelmail to Centos6/

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 12/18/2012 9:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. > I inherited a server running openwebmail and have since added roundcube (so we now have both available). I actually prefer

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

John Hinton wrote: > On 12/19/2012 3:21 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: >> We are currently still using SquirrelMail. I hate the GUI >> (aesthetically), but it works well and there are plugins for about >> everything one would ask. If only someone could create a nice >> contemporary GUI (HTML 5) for it!

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 12/19/2012 3:21 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > We are currently still using SquirrelMail. I hate the GUI > (aesthetically), but it works well and there are plugins for about > everything one would ask. If only someone could create a nice > contemporary GUI (HTML 5) for it! If someone wants Outlo

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

Am 19.12.2012 05:03, schrieb Gregory P. Ennis: > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. We have been using Squirrelmail for years on two servers without any problem. Recently we switched one of the servers to Horde b

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

SilverTip257 wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: >> On 19/12/2012 9:43 πμ, M. Fioretti wrote: >> >> I have used Horde (in test mode, not in production) and it is good, but >> we had various issues, esp. when working with mobile devices. A bit >> complex in configuring /

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 19/12/2012 9:43 πμ, M. Fioretti wrote: > > I have used Horde (in test mode, not in production) and it is good, but > we had various issues, esp. when working with mobile devices. A bit > complex in configuring / maintaining. > Our webma

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 12/18/2012 10:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. An engineering company I recently worked for switched from squirrelmail to roundcube. The users liked roundcube m

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 12/18/12 23:03, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. My hosting provider has squirrelmail, roundcube, and horde. After I tried each, I decided I preferred squirrelmail.

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 19/12/2012 9:43 πμ, M. Fioretti wrote: > > >> what about Sogo: Is it slower/more complicated to install... any comment is >> appreciated! >> > I have not used SoGo yet, but I have read good things about it from many > admins. > {snip} > Other free groupwar

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 19.12.2012 04:03, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do > any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. If all you want is simple webmail than check out Roundcube, it's OK, has some nice features and it's easy to inst

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

. Ennis Para: Centos Enviado: Miércoles 19 de diciembre de 2012 5:03 Asunto: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail Everyone, Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail.  Do any of you use squirrlmail.  How do you like it.   Greg Ennis

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On 19/12/2012 9:43 πμ, M. Fioretti wrote: > what about Sogo: Is it slower/more complicated to install... any comment is > appreciated! I have not used SoGo yet, but I have read good things about it from many admins. It is probably the only one free/open-source solution which works well with Ou

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 23:51:38 PM -0500, Digimer wrote: > I used it for many years, but switched to RoundCube as SM seems to > not be growing much anymore. Been happy with RC so far. I too use Squirrelmail, but found myself thinking more and more frequently in the last months to find an alternativ

Re: [CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

I used it for many years, but switched to RoundCube as SM seems to not be growing much anymore. Been happy with RC so far. On 12/18/2012 11:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any > of you use squirrlmail. How do you

[CentOS] web mail and Squirrelmail

Everyone, Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. Greg Ennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

www.centos.org is now restored to Talk Talk customers in one of England's most densely populated areas. Bye. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:21 +0100, Jake Shipton wrote: > I Had Tiscali, I was glad to get off of them. Tiscali/Talk Talk/Opal can be an unforgettable nightmare. > Though I was sad to leave "Be*" ISP when I moved from Essex to Lincs. They used highly skilled support staff in Rumania and Czech

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On 08/17/2011 07:20 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > Oh well must move to Plus Net for off-site use (they give extra IPs and > are owned by BT). Tried unsuccessfully via Claranet and Talk Talk > Business (formerly Nildram, Pipex, Tiscali, Opal) > > Never tried Plus Net to be honest, so I don't kno

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On 08/17/2011 02:57 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:50 -0400, ken wrote: > Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. >>> >>> Loading fine in Canada. >>> >> >> Yet another reason to move to Canada... > > How much are the Canadian Tourist B

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Michel van Deventer wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:41 +0100, Always Learning wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:32 +0100, Ken Smith wrote: I available from India too. at this point of time -- Regards, Rajagopal __

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:41 +0100, Always Learning wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:32 +0100, Ken Smith wrote: > > Fine here on Claranet South London UK > > I'm trying from one of their London data centres, without success Fine from here (Netherlands) traceroute to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, ken wrote: > Yet another reason to move to Canada... Now there's two. :-) -- Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:50 -0400, ken wrote: > >> > >> Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. > > > > Loading fine in Canada. > > > > Yet another reason to move to Canada... How much are the Canadian Tourist Board paying you ;-) -- With best regards, Paul. Eng

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On 08/17/2011 01:53 PM Digimer wrote: > On 08/17/2011 01:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or >> 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) >> >> Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. > > Loading fine in Canada. >

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:32 +0100, Ken Smith wrote: > Fine here on Claranet South London UK I'm trying from one of their London data centres, without success. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:28 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: >> Thank you (Dank U wel). > You're welcome (graag gedaan). Ik kan ook 'dank je wel' schrijven of bedankt. Ik heb een beetje heimwee voor Nederland maar ik been toch Engels. Hopefully the defective Internet in parts of England will restor

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

Fine here on Claranet South London UK Always Learning wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:06 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > >> Works fine from Singapore. >> Must be your ISP thing. >> > Yes I guess so. > > I tried via Manchester with one ISP and via London with an unrelated > ISP :-( > > >

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:54 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: > >> It's working from here (NL). > > and Digimer says it works from Canada, so it must be English related :-( > > > Thank you (Dank U wel). You're welcome (graag gedaan). > > > > -- > With best regards, > > Paul. > England, > EU. > > >

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:17:38PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:06 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > Works fine from Singapore. > > Must be your ISP thing. > > Yes I guess so. A good site to use to check that is http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ -- Scott R

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:06 +0100, Jake Shipton wrote: > I wouldn't be so sure, from a BT Home connection here in England it's > working fine for me. Oh well must move to Plus Net for off-site use (they give extra IPs and are owned by BT). Tried unsuccessfully via Claranet and Talk Talk Business

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:06 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Works fine from Singapore. > Must be your ISP thing. Yes I guess so. I tried via Manchester with one ISP and via London with an unrelated ISP :-( -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: > To: Centos > From: Always Learning > Subject: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down > > Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or > 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) > > Tried from two places

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On 08/17/2011 06:57 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:54 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: > >> It's working from here (NL). > > and Digimer says it works from Canada, so it must be English related :-( > > > Thank you (Dank U wel). > > > I wouldn't be so sure, from a BT Home

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

Works fine from Singapore. Must be your ISP thing. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: > >> Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or >> 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) >> >> Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. > > As others

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: > Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or > 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) > > Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. As others have said, it works fine from the US. But one of our engineers

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On 08/17/11 10:51 AM, Always Learning wrote: > Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or > 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) > > Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. working fine from here in California. -- john r pierce

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:54 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: > It's working from here (NL). and Digimer says it works from Canada, so it must be English related :-( Thank you (Dank U wel). -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

> Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or > 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) > > Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. > It's working from here (NL). > > > > > -- > With best regards, > > Paul. > England, > EU. > > >

Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

On 08/17/2011 01:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or > 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) > > Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. Loading fine in Canada. -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteev

[CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down

Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

Re: [CentOS] Web based file versioning frontend

On 5/20/2011 4:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/20/11 1:16 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>> Git and Gitweb? >> >> Thought of that, is there anything that can monitor for changes so I can >> avoid a commit command for every script, as they all dump to an already >> well organized tree, I was hoping

Re: [CentOS] Web based file versioning frontend

On 5/20/11 1:16 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Git and Gitweb? > > Thought of that, is there anything that can monitor for changes so I can > avoid a commit command for every script, as they all dump to an already > well organized tree, I was hoping to monitor the top level dir for changes > and ha

Re: [CentOS] Web based file versioning frontend

You could perhaps start your search surrounding inotify type monitors and tie them into some auto-commit... Something like what you're doing may run the realm of custom coding. Sorry I can't be of more help. On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>Git and Gitweb? > > Thought

Re: [CentOS] Web based file versioning frontend

>Git and Gitweb? Thought of that, is there anything that can monitor for changes so I can avoid a commit command for every script, as they all dump to an already well organized tree, I was hoping to monitor the top level dir for changes and have it commit as they appear. Something like that exist

Re: [CentOS] Web based file versioning frontend

Git and Gitweb? On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Hey guys, > Need an opinion on what to use for file versioning text conf files that get > updated by > scheduled rsync's etc. Need something that can watch the file, so it doesn't > need an > explicit checkin, and can b

[CentOS] Web based file versioning frontend

Hey guys, Need an opinion on what to use for file versioning text conf files that get updated by scheduled rsync's etc. Need something that can watch the file, so it doesn't need an explicit checkin, and can be diffed by a web front end. I haven't any preference on backend either. Thanks for an

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

I'll have a look at them again. But even tough I think it is good to have updated php version this one has been running for more than a year and these problems only started a few weeks ago. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > The ius packages are fine, you shouldn't use an un

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

The ius packages are fine, you shouldn't use an unpatched old PHP version. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

Hi, Yes Centos-Testing. I've been using for a while (1 year) with no problems. The last ius package that I've used (5.2.15?) kept aborting without any good reason. On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > As John says: from where did you get it? Or is this from CentOS-testing? >

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

As John says: from where did you get it? Or is this from CentOS-testing? (I didn't follow testing or extras for versions.) I recommend ius for those packages that replace base packages. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

On 03/11/11 2:45 PM, robert mena wrote: > Ok. centos does not offer any newer than this. indeed, el5's default version is 5.1.6, and there's nothing newer than that in the standard repositories, so your 5.2.10 must have come from somewhere else? _

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

Ok. centos does not offer any newer than this. got a better place to use? On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Robert mena wrote on Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:26:03 -0400: > > > php 5.2.10 > > upgrade > > Kai > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

Robert mena wrote on Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:26:03 -0400: > php 5.2.10 upgrade Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

robert mena wrote: > Hi, > > I have a web server which is randomly becoming unresponsive. I've > checked for hardware problems with no luck : > - no ethernet errors > - no disk errors > - no memory errors > > So far I've managed to point the trouble at the web server since if I > restart httpd (a

Re: [CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:26:03 -0400 robert mena wrote: > a) my own code is behaving strangely. For example, a php script that in a > given situation/parameters increases the usage. Log your script's activities to a file with lots of detail. Got here, found this, load is that. If you're concern

[CentOS] Web server becoming unresponsive : high load

Hi, I have a web server which is randomly becoming unresponsive. I've checked for hardware problems with no luck : - no ethernet errors - no disk errors - no memory errors So far I've managed to point the trouble at the web server since if I restart httpd (apache) it comes back to normal. This

Re: [CentOS] Web statistics - w3perl

On 11/4/2010 8:03 AM, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Lanny Marcus > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Camron W. Fox > mailto:cw...@us.fujitsu.com>> wrote: > > On 10/10/13 08:12, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > >> I am co

Re: [CentOS] Web statistics - w3perl

On 4.11.2010 15.03, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: > You could considerhttp://piwik.org/ . > > I haven't used it myself but it looks like a decent alternative. Thanks for tip. Their online demo looks neat - for most parts it is understandable by layman, which I think is good. They use Flash for gra

Re: [CentOS] Web statistics - w3perl

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Camron W. Fox > wrote: > > On 10/10/13 08:12, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > >> I am considering a richer alternative to good old Webalizer, in a > >> webhotel (multidomain) setting. > >> > >> Any experience with w3perl?

Re: [CentOS] Web statistics - w3perl

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Camron W. Fox wrote: > On 10/10/13 08:12, Jussi Hirvi wrote: >> I am considering a richer alternative to good old Webalizer, in a >> webhotel (multidomain) setting. >> >> Any experience with w3perl? The demo at least looks impressive. >> >> http://www.w3perl.com >>

  1   2   3   >