On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 12:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think the firefox/OOo version jumps are the surprises here. We've
> come to expect boring consistency with few feature changes across minor
> updates. I think it is a great thing for the desktop apps to change
> faster than the base
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the real version ... 5.2 is just a point in time set of
updates for CentOS-5. Understand that if you had RHEL-5 and ran an
update, it would also update you to the same packages. What this
means is that 5.2 is just an update set for CentO
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the real version ... 5.2 is just a point in time set of
updates for CentOS-5. Understand that if you had RHEL-5 and ran an
update, it would also update you to the same packages. What this means
is that 5.2 is just an update set for CentOS-5 .. not really a n
Ben Marsh wrote:
Hi,
With the release of 5.2 "yum update" seems to be upgrading our
computers from CentOS 5.1 to CentOS 5.2. I note from release notes for
5.2 that you are only supposed to get 5.2 if you type in "yum upgrade".
On two seperate machines entering "yum update" has resulted in
Ben Marsh wrote:
Hi,
With the release of 5.2 "yum update" seems to be upgrading our
computers from CentOS 5.1 to CentOS 5.2. I note from release notes for
5.2 that you are only supposed to get 5.2 if you type in "yum upgrade".
On two seperate machines entering "yum update" has resulted in
Hi,
With the release of 5.2 "yum update" seems to be upgrading our
computers from CentOS 5.1 to CentOS 5.2. I note from release notes for
5.2 that you are only supposed to get 5.2 if you type in "yum upgrade".
On two seperate machines entering "yum update" has resulted in yum
geting repo
6 matches
Mail list logo
