> Thanks, Akemi, that's really useful, and I'd never heard of it. I suppose
> that as it gets updated, it'll tell me the most current legacy to use (in
> my case, the 310.40 worked, but the 340.58 did not... and that was trial
> and error.
It's all in the README that comes with the driver ... o
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>>> Now, back to my boxes. NVIDIA declared these fancy cards obsolete (the
>>> are only about 6 years old, and hardware still does appropriate job for
>>> what we need). There is no proprietary NVIDIA driver whi
On Wed, May 6, 2015 10:20 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a couple of boxes with NVIDIA cards and fancy screen setup. I
>> have
>> to use NVIDIA proprietary driver, open source driver does not support
>> configuration. Darn Nvidia never released enough infor
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:28 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>
>> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me
>> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and put
>> in a secure place
>>
>
> You do not understand the situation I presente
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Now, back to my boxes. NVIDIA declared these fancy cards obsolete (the are
>> only about 6 years old, and hardware still does appropriate job for what
>> we need). There is no proprietary NVIDIA driver which you can install with
>
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a couple of boxes with NVIDIA cards and fancy screen setup. I have
> to use NVIDIA proprietary driver, open source driver does not support
> configuration. Darn Nvidia never released enough information about their
> Now, back to my boxes. NVIDIA declared these
On Wed, May 6, 2015 9:28 am, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me
>> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and
>> put
>> in a secure place
>>
>
> You do not understand the situation I p
> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me
> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and put
> in a secure place
>
You do not understand the situation I presented. This is about avoiding
a situation where in a highly complex envirno
Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 06.05.2015 um 13:04 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>>
>>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
>>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
>>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Impor
Am 06.05.2015 um 13:04 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>
>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or
>> Critical updat
On 05/06/2015 06:04 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or
>> Critical update
> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or
> Critical updates.
That is an important qualifier: *If* that box touches the Inter
On 05/06/2015 03:04 AM, Jatin Davey wrote:
> On 5/6/2015 1:18 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Jatin Davey :
>>> My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
>>
>> Best practice: update to the latest OS version:
>>
>> # cat /etc/redhat-release
>> CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
>>
>>
>>
>>> [r
On 5/6/2015 1:18 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 06.05.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Jatin Davey :
My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
Best practice: update to the latest OS version:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu S
Am 06.05.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Jatin Davey :
> My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
Best practice: update to the latest OS version:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
> [root@localhost ~]# uname -a
> Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64
> x86_6
Hi All
My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
I wanted to know if the virtio drivers on this guest are stable.
16 matches
Mail list logo
