> If you do not change any of the CentOS RPMS with your added content then
> it would be fine to use the official CentOS branding and installer.
> Your content as well as ours (the entire compilation) would need to be
> GPL compatible with sources available, etc.
We don't change any CentOS RPMS, a
On 01/15/2013 03:15 AM, Giacomo Sanchietti wrote:
> Hi.
> my name is Giacomo Sanchietti and I'm working for a company called Nethesis.
>
> We are working on a CentOS derived distribution like SME Server.
> It's a minimal CentOS with a software layer on top to add a web
> configuration interface.
>
On 15.01.2013 09:15, Giacomo Sanchietti wrote:
> Hi.
> my name is Giacomo Sanchietti and I'm working for a company called
> Nethesis.
>
> We are working on a CentOS derived distribution like SME Server.
> It's a minimal CentOS with a software layer on top to add a web
> configuration interface.
>
On 15.01.2013 10:15, Giacomo Sanchietti wrote:
> We did not rebrand anaconda, so during installation (and first boot)
> CentOS logo and name will be visible. Is this a problem? Are there any
> legal issues? Do we need to rebrand all the distro?
Please read the commercial faq:
http://www.centos.org/
Hi.
my name is Giacomo Sanchietti and I'm working for a company called Nethesis.
We are working on a CentOS derived distribution like SME Server.
It's a minimal CentOS with a software layer on top to add a web
configuration interface.
The CD iso, it's a CentOS minimal CD with some extras package
5 matches
Mail list logo