On 26/08/10 00:03, Todd Denniston wrote:
> And if you are maintaining more than one machine at home, you need to realize
> that you don't need to
> waste the time twice to update the same thing on two machines. Assuming your
> home machines are
> networked together.
Good Point. I run a 'fat' s
> My 'work' is at home (dialup). The local library is only good for
> about 1.5mbits/sec (about 150kbytes/sec). I don't have enough free
> disk space for a full repo on either my laptop or my desktop.
While not currently supported by the main CentOS project (AFAIK), there are
presto repos out t
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:28:04 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote:
> >> > The main problem is
Greetings,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> My 'work' is at home (dialup). The local library is only good for
> about 1.5mbits/sec (about 150kbytes/sec). I don't have enough free
> disk space for a full repo on either my laptop or my desktop.
>
Perhaps it's time for y
On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote:
>> > The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow
>> > and *unreliable* dial-up interfa
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote:
> > The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow
> > and *unreliable* dial-up interface -- it in fact behaves extremly
> Grab a copy of a reposit
Les Mikesell wrote, On 08/25/2010 08:29 AM:
> On 8/25/10 7:14 AM, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list.
>>
>> I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh
>> installations.
>> Now when I ins
Robert,
On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote:
> The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow
> and *unreliable* dial-up interface -- it in fact behaves extremly
Grab a copy of a repository at work, copy it home and set up a local
repository. Yum will be perfectly h
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:19:25 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote:
> >
> > This is ok when I have good internet speed (@work) but when I am home, this
> > update takes a lot of time.
>
> Welcome to life on th
On 8/25/10 7:14 AM, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list.
>
> I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh
> installations.
> Now when I install fresh CentOS 5.5 (in VM) I am getting info that
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote:
>
> This is ok when I have good internet speed (@work) but when I am home, this
> update takes a lot of time.
Welcome to life on the internet.
> I guess I can skip updates but I wasn't experiencing such annoyance w
Hi all,
I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list.
I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh
installations.
Now when I install fresh CentOS 5.5 (in VM) I am getting info that there are
50 packages updates.
This is ok when I have good inter
12 matches
Mail list logo
