On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> how about yum.log ? if you dont mind attaching that, I think there is
> enough info for a bugreport on bugs.centos.org
The yum.logs don't show anything about memory issues. Maybe I only
assumed it was a memory issue and quit out of the upd
On 05/16/2010 09:27 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> The issue came up *after* I had downloaded all the update files. My
> used space was 99%, approximately 230 Megs were shown available at /.
> There was no memory available in my tmpfs directory/partition.
...
> If you think that I have enough informatio
Thanks!
ssh jzhome 'cat /etc/issue'
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m
^_^
--
John Maclean
MSc. (DIC) BSc. (Hons)
Linux Systems and Applications
07739 171 531
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
On 05/15/2010 05:05 PM, Ned Slider informed us:
> Robert wrote:
>
>>
>
>
>
>> Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD
>> K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in
>> the "beggars can't be choosers" folder.
>>
>>
>
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 05/15/2010 08:05 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>> My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of
>> disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space,
>
> yum tries to do some space required estimates befor
On 05/15/2010 08:05 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of
> disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space,
yum tries to do some space required estimates before starting the
process, so its clearly got that wrong in your
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:49 PM, E Westphal wrote:
> Ditto here as well. All 133 packages updated without a problem. When
> re-booting, got a 'warning' that kdump had to rebuild. Once that completed,
> everything seems as it was before. Yes, things do seem a little 'snappier' -
> maybe it's only
On Saturday 15 May 2010 16:34, Robert wrote:
> Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the
> AMD K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file
> it in the "beggars can't be choosers" folder.
That's strange, because lM-sensors now detects my AMD Phe
Robert wrote:
>
> Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD
> K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in
> the "beggars can't be choosers" folder.
>
That's because your kernel does not have a k10temp driver - it was only
introduce
On 05/15/2010 02:49 PM, E Westphal informed us:
> Ditto here as well. All 133 packages updated without a problem. When
> re-booting, got a 'warning' that kdump had to rebuild. Once that
> completed, everything seems as it was before. Yes, things do seem a
> little 'snappier' - maybe it's only
Ditto here as well. All 133 packages updated without a problem. When
re-booting, got a 'warning' that kdump had to rebuild. Once that
completed, everything seems as it was before. Yes, things do seem a
little 'snappier' - maybe it's only a delusion brought about by wishful
thinking - I like it when
My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of
disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space,
but the update process continued from where I left off without a hitch
-- and that's hardly CentOS's fault. I've still got to update my
laptop, but am a little lee
12 matches
Mail list logo
