Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-13 Thread Charles Polisher
James B. Byrne wrote: > Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on the > > second machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes that > > there is already an instance ru

Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-13 Thread James B. Byrne
On Mon, January 12, 2015 09:40, Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on the > second machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes that > there is already an instance

Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-12 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:50:10AM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 14:40 +, Rushton Martin wrote: > > > > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on > > the second machine

Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-12 Thread Bill Maltby (C4B)
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 14:40 +, Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME shared > between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on the second > machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes that there is > already an i

Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-12 Thread Thomas Eriksson
On 01/12/2015 06:40 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on > the second machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes > that there is already an instance running

Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-12 Thread Rushton Martin
>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:12:48PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: >> > On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: >> > > >> > In a nutshell, after I would terminate Firefox as part of my normal >> > log off process, there would be another instance of Firefox left >> > hanging around