"William L. Maltby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Sorry to hear that your getting so little support from the community.
<<
Oh, I'm not complaining on that score; in fact, I'm not complaining at all.
I just fired up BitTorrent to help out, and I figured I could use a 5.1 DVD
anyway. Right now, my
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:50 +1100, Les Bell wrote:
> "William L. Maltby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>
> At 07:40 EST (+5 UTC?) with most of the U.S still asleep, I've 8 and 6
> peers connected and uploading for the 4.6 and 5.1 DVDs respectively.
> <<
>
> As I write, I've had the torrent runn
"William L. Maltby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
At 07:40 EST (+5 UTC?) with most of the U.S still asleep, I've 8 and 6
peers connected and uploading for the 4.6 and 5.1 DVDs respectively.
<<
As I write, I've had the torrent running for approximately 12 hours; I have
50 peers connected and am g
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rcpt-To:
Kenneth Porter wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:01:31 -0800:
> speedup is 2.14
Ah, and I was wondering all the time what that means. Seems to be the
reciprocal downloaded:keptfromseed ratio?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Ser
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:05 +, John Bowden wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2007 23:24:01 Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) iso
On Monday 17 December 2007 23:24:01 Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
> >> DVD. My normal dnld from a mirr
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 03:05:52 Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 5:16 PM, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 4:58 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
> >
> > Sounds like something is
On 12/18/07, Von <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brilliant. Thanks for the tip!
Thank Andrew Tridgell. He's the brilliant one that wrote rsync and Samba. :)
--
Robert Arkiletian
Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada
Fl_TeacherTool http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/
C++ GUI tut
--On Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:29 PM -0800 Robert Arkiletian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rsync -Pv
rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.1/isos/i386/CentOS-5.1-i386-bin-DVD.i
so .
You should get upto 50% savings. At least I did with the CD iso's in
the past. The capital P is --partial --progre
On Dec 18, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On 12/17/07, Von <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your
5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of
bandwi
On 12/17/07, Von <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >
> > Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your
> > 5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of
> > bandwidth.
>
>
> I could be tired, but could you
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:30 AM + Karanbir Singh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so keeping that in context - why exactly
would someone want to download 5.0 when 5.0 +
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 07:02 -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Both my systems are already up-to-date. I'm just getting the images for
> > backup, new installs and to share via torrent.
> >
> > I saw one poster mention rsync. I would expec
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, William L. Maltby wrote:
[...]
Both my systems are already up-to-date. I'm just getting the images for
backup, new installs and to share via torrent.
I saw one poster mention rsync. I would expect the rebuilds had lots of
underlying lib changes along with some higher-level
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 20:24 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
When I did 5.0 and 4.5, I got great results, but I saw lots of peers
then. This time I've seen many fewer and that is causing the abysmal
results I saw.
>
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your
5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of
bandwidth.
I could be tired, but could you please elaborate how this is possible?
A dvd iso with X numb
On Monday, December 17, 2007 7:05 PM -0800 Robert Arkiletian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your
5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of
bandwidth.
That surprises me. Won't similar RPM's in the two images likel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
the port your client is using for torrent should be enabled in any
firewalls (and if you're being NAT, it should be forwarded). If i'm in
a corporate environment where this is impossible, I'll use a shell
s
On Dec 17, 2007 5:16 PM, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Monday, December 17, 2007 4:58 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
>
> Sounds like something is throttling your torrent connection. Start by using
> a non-standard to
--On Monday, December 17, 2007 4:58 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
Sounds like something is throttling your torrent connection. Start by using
a non-standard torrent port to escape traffic shaping by naive throttles.
With places suc
--On Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:30 AM + Karanbir Singh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so keeping that in context - why exactly
would someone want to download 5.0 when 5.0 + updates is 5.1 ?
In m
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
With places such as utah.edu [I am in North America] I got
320Kb/sec steady. It took me 3hr and a bit to download the 5.1
dvd. As far as I understand it, Utah and the other mirrors donated
the bandwidth to the community.
--
Thanks
http://w
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) isos on the tracker now.
Does it place much load on the tracker to leave the older torrents listed?
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so
Kenneth Porter wrote:
>> We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) isos on the tracker now.
>
> Does it place much load on the tracker to leave the older torrents listed?
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so keeping that in context - why exac
--On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:24 PM -0600 Johnny Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) isos on the tracker now.
Does it place much load on the tracker to leave the older torrents listed?
The connection error I'm seeing seems to be some kind of firewall block
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:24 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
> >> DVD. My normal dnld from a mirr
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
>> DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec.
>>
>> I'll wait until most of the U.S. g
--On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec.
I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use th
Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec.
I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use the
normal download though.
Here's hoping...
--
Bill
_
29 matches
Mail list logo
