Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-11 Thread Matt Shields
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Chris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're looking at SugarCRM 5, but they strongly recommend PHP 5.2.4. Looking > around I see that a few individuals are maintaining repos for CentOS, but > I'd prefer to get it from one of the larger repositories. > > Anyone o

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread centOS
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:29:21 +0100 Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > anyway, we should have php-5.2 available in centos-5 within the > next couple of weeks Is the cat out of the bag? Yeeah!! -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread Karanbir Singh
Chris Boyd wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar >>> work, and the Sugar support group is strongly recommending it. > > Ah, I was not clear. They are strongly recommending PHP 5.2, not RHEL :-) you

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread Chris Boyd
On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar work, and the Sugar support group is strongly recommending it. Ah, I was not clear. They are strongly recommending PHP 5.2, not RHEL :-) anyway, we should have php-5.2

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread Karanbir Singh
Chris Boyd wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> Are you certain you need 5.2.x? SugarCRM is a RH partner, and offered >> a bundled sugarcrm install through rhx.redhat.com > > We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar > work, and the Sugar support

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread Chris Boyd
On Apr 10, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: Are you certain you need 5.2.x? SugarCRM is a RH partner, and offered a bundled sugarcrm install through rhx.redhat.com We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar work, and the Sugar support group is strongly recommendi

Re: [CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Chris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're looking at SugarCRM 5, but they strongly recommend PHP 5.2.4. Looking > around I see that a few individuals are maintaining repos for CentOS, but > I'd prefer to get it from one of the larger repositories. > > Anyone o

[CentOS] SugarCRM pro and PHP 5.2

2008-04-10 Thread Chris Boyd
We're looking at SugarCRM 5, but they strongly recommend PHP 5.2.4. Looking around I see that a few individuals are maintaining repos for CentOS, but I'd prefer to get it from one of the larger repositories. Anyone out there using http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ ? Any idea when PH