Just after getting storage into the webapp kinda funny really
When we started working with the tech HTML5 storage wasn't really viable...
It's an internal only app though so as long as I can get gears on 64bit
firefox 3.5 and safari on mac it's fine till the relevant code is tested
workin
James Hogarth wrote:
> I have google gears installed on our 64bit firefoxes on firefox 3.5.5 in
> centos 5.4 with flash 10 - all from rpm ;)
>
> Works very nicely..
>
Google is focusing on HTML5 these days anyway. They're maintaining
Gears for those sites who currently utilize it but I'd
I have google gears installed on our 64bit firefoxes on firefox 3.5.5 in
centos 5.4 with flash 10 - all from rpm ;)
Works very nicely..
2009/12/17 Marko Vojinovic
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 23:51:43 Jake Shipton wrote:
> > On 16/12/09 23:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 23:51:43 Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 16/12/09 23:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:52:05 Jake Shipton wrote:
> >> Any machine I have that can run in x86_64, I normally install a x86_64
> >> OS, and recently,
> >> I haven't found anything I ne
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> > I haven't found anything I need that is only i686.
>>
>> Skype?
>
> Actually, my contribution to your "list" would be acroread. The free
> pdf readers still aren't up to the task in some cases, sadly.
>
> Interesting that it's the closed-so
On 16/12/09 23:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:52:05 Jake Shipton wrote:
>
>> On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>>
>>> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable...
>>>
>> Personally, if you had asked this 3 years ago, I'd have sa
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 23:37 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Any machine I have that can run in x86_64, I normally install a
> x86_64
> > OS, and recently,
> > I haven't found anything I need that is only i686.
>
> Skype?
Actually, my contribution to your "list" would be acroread. The free
pdf
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:52:05 Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote:
> > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable...
>
> Personally, if you had asked this 3 years ago, I'd have said "Go i686"
> due to compatibility.
> But now-a-days with up-to-date
On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote:
> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>
> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
> boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
> RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any adv
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Longer answer: every single move, down at the machine/assembly level, can
> move twice as many bits as on a 32-bit system. That will show up as a very
> serious speed increase in your software.
>
actually, the pentiums have had a 64bit physical memory bus since the
fi
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote:
> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>
> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
> boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
> RAM (currently only has 1 GB) -
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:53 -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
> is there any advantage to my running
> x86_64 on that machine instead of i386...
A better question might be, do you have any particular reason not to run
x86_64 on that machine?
All of my machines and the machines that I look after are
At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:53:01 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>
> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
> boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
> RAM (current
Hey thats an interesting bit of trivia - thanks :) Large memory - bah -
this silly machine maxes out at 4 GB...
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
> Scot P. Floess wrote:
>> Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware
>> virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC
Ah good point... Wasn't thinking in those terms... Well clearly wasn't
thinking at all ;)
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>>
>> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
>> boxes are all i386
Scot P. Floess wrote:
> Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware
> virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC430 if that helps???
>
I believe those were a pair of the P4 "Prescott" chips in a single
package, and pretty much what I said, 64bit works, but there's litt
> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>
> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
> boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
> RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running
> x86_64 on that mac
so to be honest...what really spawned this... I put all my VMs on an NFS
share. I've got an F11 VM I run...but on my x86_64 host - starting the
F11 VM (its an i386 VM) fails to start. If I run F11 x86_64 it works
fine. I' really just trying to simplify things and standards on one type
of V
Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware
virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC430 if that helps???
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
> Scot P. Floess wrote:
>> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>>
>> I have one box on my home netwo
Scot P. Floess wrote:
> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>
> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
> boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
> RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my runnin
Scot P. Floess wrote:
> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
>
> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
> boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
> RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my runn
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running
x86_64 on that machine ins
22 matches
Mail list logo
