On 16.5.2012 2.42, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Now I just have to fix the sendmail ("rx" instance) config so that it
> really sends the email to localhost (where amavis is listening), instead
> of trying to send directly to the final destination.
Ok, I found it, and it is *so* obvious. Still it took me h
On 16.5.2012 1.03, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> define(`ESMTP_MAILER_ARGS',`TCP $h 10024')dnl
> Right, here you modify the target port of that Sendmail instance. And I
> bet $1.000 that if you tcpdump on the main mail server you will see the
> sending attempt to come in there at port 10024 and thus
Am 15.05.2012 23:39, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
> Just in case, here is my conf for the rx instance. To repeat, this
> sendmail instance sends everything to amavisd at port 10024.
> - Jussi
Ah, here i
On 16.5.2012 0.37, Frank Cox wrote:
> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>
> One server here, one across town, or even two separate boxes in a single room
> -- sure. But in the same box? If the the box is on fire, now you're out both
> your main and your backup server.
>
> I must be
on 5/15/2012 2:39 PM Jussi Hirvi spake the following:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
> Just in case, here is my conf for the rx instance. To repeat, this
> sendmail instance sends everything to amavisd at port 10024.
> - Jussi
Am 15.05.2012 23:42, schrieb Larry Martell:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Frank Cox
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
>> Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
>>
>> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>>
Am 15.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Frank Cox:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
> Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
>
> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>
> One server here, one across town, or even two separate boxes
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
> Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
>
> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>
> One server here, one across town, or even two separat
Am 15.05.2012 23:19, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> What is the content of the submit.mc? Your previous log snipplet showed
>>
May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
>
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
Just in case, here is my conf for the rx instance. To repeat, this
sendmail instance sends everything to amavisd at port 10024.
- Jussi
divert(-1)dnl
include(`/usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VER
On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
One server here, one across town, or even two separate boxes in a single room
-- sure. But in the same box? If the
On 16.5.2012 0.24, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hmmm... dumb question: is anything out of disk space?
There are no dumb questions here. :-) The culprit has to be something
simple like that. However, df shows that there is still room.
- Jussi
___
CentOS ma
On 16.5.2012 0.18, John Hinton wrote:
> A couple of things to check. I don't know if these servers are in the
> same location or not but it is possible if not, that your provider
> blocks port 25. Here are two configs to check.
Thanks for input. I can make the contact from the backup-mailserver to
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> What is the content of the submit.mc? Your previous log snipplet showed
>>
>>> > May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
>
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
> Yes. In a dual sendma
On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> What is the content of the submit.mc? Your previous log snipplet showed
>
>> > May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
Yes. In a dual sendmail setup there are two instan
On 5/15/2012 4:57 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 5/15/2012 4:48 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> On 15.5.2012 23.22, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> It is technically impossible that the telnet to target port 25 succeeds
>>> from the same system on which the Sendmail gets a connection refused,
>>> unless Sendma
On 5/15/2012 4:48 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 15.5.2012 23.22, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> It is technically impossible that the telnet to target port 25 succeeds
>> from the same system on which the Sendmail gets a connection refused,
>> unless Sendmail is configured to use a non-standard target po
Am 15.05.2012 22:48, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> Below is my thishost-tx.mc. It looks totally ok to me, but maybe
> somebody else spots something there. This is a dual-sendmail setup, and
> this is the conf for the transmitting sendmail instance.
>
> - Jussi
>
> divert(-1)dnl
> include(`/usr/share/s
On 15.5.2012 23.33, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Is there any chance that your sendmail is sending an invalid id?
Uh, what do you mean by id? Domain name? I assume that comes from
/etc/sysconfig/network. which correctly says
> HOSTNAME=mx2.greenspot.fi
- Jussi
__
On 15.5.2012 23.22, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> It is technically impossible that the telnet to target port 25 succeeds
> from the same system on which the Sendmail gets a connection refused,
> unless Sendmail is configured to use a non-standard target port.
That is why I am baffled. :-/
I could us
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Some more info. Below is a more complete telnet session from backup mail
> server (mx2.greenspot.fi) to primary mail server (mail.greenspot.fi).
>
> It only proves that sending mail works fine from command-line. But my
> sendmail setup cannot do the same.
Is there any chance t
Some more info. Below is a more complete telnet session from backup mail
server (mx2.greenspot.fi) to primary mail server (mail.greenspot.fi).
It only proves that sending mail works fine from command-line. But my
sendmail setup cannot do the same.
I wrote that MAILER-DAEMON can get mail through
Am 15.05.2012 21:44, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> Our backup mail server (which I have just re-configured) tries to
> contact the primary mail server, and fails. My log shows repeatedly
> "connection refused":
>
> May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
> (mail.greenspot.f
Our backup mail server (which I have just re-configured) tries to
contact the primary mail server, and fails. My log shows repeatedly
"connection refused":
May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
(mail.greenspot.fi. [83.143.217.182]) failed: Connection refused by
ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
