Re: [CentOS] Seamonkey and flash-plugin

2009-01-31 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: >> So -- has anyone gotten 1.1.15 Seamonkey working with the latest flash >> plugin on Centos? I don't want to update Seamonkey on the Centos box if >> its not working. >> >> > One thing -- that should've been v1.1.14 instead of ...15 above. no problem here, with

Re: [CentOS] Seamonkey and flash-plugin

2009-01-30 Thread Charles E Campbell Jr
MHR wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Charles E Campbell Jr > wrote: > >> Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I like using Seamonkey; I have v1.1.13 on Centos. It works with >>> flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm. >>> >>> > : > >>> So -- has anyone g

Re: [CentOS] Seamonkey and flash-plugin

2009-01-30 Thread MHR
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: > Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I like using Seamonkey; I have v1.1.13 on Centos. It works with >> flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm. >> : >> >> So -- has anyone gotten 1.1.15 Seamonkey working with the latest fla

Re: [CentOS] Seamonkey and flash-plugin

2009-01-30 Thread Charles E Campbell Jr
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: > Hello! > > I like using Seamonkey; I have v1.1.13 on Centos. It works with > flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm. > > On my home computer, I have Fedora Core 9; Seamonkey + flash-plugin used > to work with the same version combination above. > Unfortunately, I

[CentOS] Seamonkey and flash-plugin

2009-01-30 Thread Charles E Campbell Jr
Hello! I like using Seamonkey; I have v1.1.13 on Centos. It works with flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm. On my home computer, I have Fedora Core 9; Seamonkey + flash-plugin used to work with the same version combination above. Unfortunately, I updated Seamonkey to v1.1.15, and every ti