Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> This again reflects my original experience with SELinux: massive
> resource hog and this is just a lowly loaded webserver. Naturally it
> seems to me that this doesn't seem like it should be the norm.
You do not need setroubleshoot to run selinux, so your comment up ther
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Craig White wrote:
> did you 'relabel' the entire filesystem? - that's pretty much necessary
> if you've been running the system without having SELinux running, at
> least in permissive mode.
SELinux had been running in permissive. I did not disable during
install
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 12:00 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Spinning off from the other thread about SELinux, I just tried to
> re-enable SELinux on my personal server hosting just email and forum
> for a small local community.
>
> Average load for this Intel Core 2 Duo box with 2GB of ram (usua
Spinning off from the other thread about SELinux, I just tried to
re-enable SELinux on my personal server hosting just email and forum
for a small local community.
Average load for this Intel Core 2 Duo box with 2GB of ram (usually
with some 1GB free) was generally below 0.4 for the last 24hrs,
av
4 matches
Mail list logo
