On Sep 30, 2011 1:49 PM, "Michael Crilly" wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why you would want each website on its own Apache process (as
> that just isn't needed), but some of the ideas here are a bit...
> over-the-top.
>
> There are a few options of improving the security of your Apache setup.
You
> can u
I'm not sure why you would want each website on its own Apache process (as
that just isn't needed), but some of the ideas here are a bit...
over-the-top.
There are a few options of improving the security of your Apache setup. You
can use something like FastCGI based PHP applications or suPHP; both
On Sep 30, 2011 11:43 AM, "John R Pierce" wrote:
>
> On 09/30/11 9:26 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> > However they also
> > want to have the CMS write to the .htaccess files to dynamically control
> > which users can access the dowloads portion of the sites. That Im
strongly
> > against.
>
> CMS s
On 09/30/11 9:26 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> However they also
> want to have the CMS write to the .htaccess files to dynamically control
> which users can access the dowloads portion of the sites. That Im strongly
> against.
CMS systems almost always use their own authentication and downloading
On Sep 30, 2011 10:58 AM, "Drew" wrote:
>
> > I think Trey needs to push back - *IF* I understand him correctly, it
> > sounds like duplicate websites, but running as different users. That,
to
> > me, literally makes no sense..., unless a) the source of the request
> > doesn't understand what
> I think Trey needs to push back - *IF* I understand him correctly, it
> sounds like duplicate websites, but running as different users. That, to
> me, literally makes no sense..., unless a) the source of the request
> doesn't understand what he wants, or b) there's something illegal going
>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having
>>> each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
>>> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
>>> example2.com has its own instan
Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:22:59PM -0500, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
>
>> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having
>> each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
>> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:22:59PM -0500, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
> website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
> example2.com has it
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 10:47 +0100, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 30 September 2011 02:22, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> > I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
> > website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
> > example1.comhas it's own Apache instanc
On 30 September 2011 02:22, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
> website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
> example2.com has its own instance
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
> website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
> example2.com has its own ins
On 09/30/2011 03:31 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 09/29/11 6:22 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
>> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
>> website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
>> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 an
On 09/29/11 6:22 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
> website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
> example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
> example2.com has its own instance of Apac
I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even
possible or realistic?
15 matches
Mail list logo