Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-08 Thread Matthew Kent
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:56 -0500, Robert wrote: > > Spike Turner wrote: > > Matthew Kent wrote: > > > > > >> Any luck with this? :) > >> > > > > Not wanting to sound like a spoil sport but if its critical > > to your server(s) can't you build your own kernel, pretty > > sure I've seen th

Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-08 Thread Robert
Spike Turner wrote: Matthew Kent wrote: Any luck with this? :) Not wanting to sound like a spoil sport but if its critical to your server(s) can't you build your own kernel, pretty sure I've seen this discussed on the docs list. I suppose the CentOS plus one has to go through QA an

Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-08 Thread Spike Turner
Matthew Kent wrote: > Any luck with this? :) Not wanting to sound like a spoil sport but if its critical to your server(s) can't you build your own kernel, pretty sure I've seen this discussed on the docs list. I suppose the CentOS plus one has to go through QA and regression testing no? Spike

Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-08 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:46, Matthew Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> You picked a good day to ask, I am getting ready to build the new plus >> kernel for c5 right now :D > > Any luck with this? :) I contacted Johnny last Friday, he

Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-08 Thread Matthew Kent
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > You picked a good day to ask, I am getting ready to build the new plus > kernel for c5 right now :D Any luck with this? :) -- Matthew Kent \ SA \ bravenet.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-01 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:57, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You picked a good day to ask, I am getting ready to build the new plus > kernel for c5 right now :D Great to know! :-D > I will put that patch in there too if it applies cleanly for me. Let me know if it doesn't. I included

Re: [CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > I have an Adaptec eSATA card, model 1225SA: > http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sata/entry/AAR-1225SA/ > > Although the chipset is sata_sil24, it is not recognized by default by > the kernel because its PCI ID is different than the on

[CentOS] Request for additional patch in CentOS Plus kernel

2008-10-01 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, I have an Adaptec eSATA card, model 1225SA: http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sata/entry/AAR-1225SA/ Although the chipset is sata_sil24, it is not recognized by default by the kernel because its PCI ID is different than the ones recognized by this driver on the CentOS