Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first
> line
> of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current
> one,
> then ask again."
>
> That's what I meant.
>
That is very comm
on 10/24/2007 1:26 PM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first
line
of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current
one,
then ask again."
That's what I meant.
That is very common with appli
on 10/24/2007 12:34 PM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first line
of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current one,
then ask again."
That's what I meant.
That is very
Johnny Hughes wrote:
No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first line
of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current one,
then ask again."
That's what I meant.
That is very common with applications. They don't back patch old
versions, and the proble
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>>>
>>> No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first line
>>> of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current one,
>>> then ask again."
>>>
>>> That's what I meant.
>>>
>> That is very common with applications. They
Scott Silva wrote:
No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first line
of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current one,
then ask again."
That's what I meant.
That is very common with applications. They don't back patch old
versions, and the problem
on 10/24/2007 4:42 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
I think it depends. If the only solution given by other lists is "update
your version of foo", I'd rather have the discussion here.
Well sometimes there will be no choice. Eg: To get milter
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> I think it depends. If the only solution given by other lists is "update
>> your version of foo", I'd rather have the discussion here.
>
> Well sometimes there will be no choice. Eg: To get milter support in
> postfix, I have to upgrade to postfi
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Ah but you cannot just replace it with another radio and expect it to
work...sendmail and postfix have very different interfaces and design. They
have their own ways of handling. Do we have to entertain stuff like
writing/debugging sendmail rulese
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Ah but you cannot just replace it with another radio and expect it to
> work...sendmail and postfix have very different interfaces and design. They
> have their own ways of handling. Do we have to entertain stuff like
> writing/debugging sendmail rulesets or how to chai
Christopher Chan wrote:
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
Where do we join the MTA bigot club?
Have your CreditCard number and details ready then call 0800-132.
:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/22/2007 9:21 PM Christopher Chan spake the following:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the f
on 10/22/2007 9:21 PM Christopher Chan spake the following:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really le
on 10/22/2007 5:16 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them
Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
Where do we join th
John R Pierce wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
>> qmail.org site.
>>
>
> or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.ka
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
on 10/22/2007 12:09 PM Mário Gamito spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm building this site about email servers - http://www.qmailrules.com
It intends to be the *most extensive and comprehensive* site about qmail.
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their
18 matches
Mail list logo
